[Honey Deeper] #001 @Shield

[420]

@Shield
https://cracked.io/Thread-Supreme-verify...om-Checker

Do you want to explain why you're integrating Discord webhooks into your Checker? Brother, don't do that and then try to conceal it with some cheap decrypters. - AntiDebugNET does not require working user:pass data from the hits to function properly, correct?

This damn "non-auth and auth shit" makes me tired, with so many rats hiding

[1.943]

ABABHHBA this man so uhq holyfuck i regret everything i said abt u

 

@realAquarius owned bozo  








@Sibrille - lifetime

[92]

The auth system was made by a banned member why it's still implemented at all is beyond me.

[539]

lmao

[3.527]

The auth system was made by a banned member why it's still implemented at all is beyond me.

Auth system has nothing to do with publishing infected programs, the auth itself does not act as a check for malware, executing such programs should be threated the same exact way as a normal program should be, carefully.

top spot by @chatgptstore - exp 17/12/24


> mid spot available <

[4.635]

thank you for sharing @Honeypot

( NEW DOMAIN: LEAKED.TOOLS )


cracked.io/Thread-UserScript-Draft-Tools-v2-Adds-Features-to-Creating-Threads

[2.386]

@Shield
https://cracked.io/Thread-Supreme-verify...om-Checker

Do you want to explain why you're integrating Discord webhooks into your Checker? Brother, don't do that and then try to conceal it with some cheap decrypters. - AntiDebugNET does not require working user:pass data from the hits to function properly, correct?

This damn "non-auth and auth shit" makes me tired, with so many rats hiding

Actually Sat is behind this , he sold the checker source code , and many people vouch him for checker. so that webhook is not my , its sat who got banned now.

[12]

Djdjjdjfjd