Scam Report against @laxy

[36]

I will simply compare the sources. So please send me both sources. @Doom @AnimeIsADev

I am not allowed to send it because I sold the source code and don't have the ownership over it anymore

---

Also I would like to add that they have never shown proof of their tos saying that scammers are banned before i got banned

@Doom only @Teken will see the source, there is no problem at all?

Well there is because the new owner literally said: “Don’t give it to anyone and don’t make any modifications” and as I said in the past you shouldn’t be in this thread and should be awarded with a warning as the rule 20 states

[1.974]

I am not allowed to send it because I sold the source code and don't have the ownership over it anymore

---

Also I would like to add that they have never shown proof of their tos saying that scammers are banned before i got banned

@Doom only @Teken will see the source, there is no problem at all?

Well there is because the new owner literally said: “Don’t give it to anyone and don’t make any modifications” and as I said in the past you shouldn’t be in this thread and should be awarded with a warning as the rule 20 states

That is an excuse. :)

[7.755]

https://AnimeIsA.Dev/PoseidonAIO has unobfuscated exes
@Teken

 

[280]

https://AnimeIsA.Dev/PoseidonAIO has unobfuscated exes
@Teken

Checked in dnSpy and it's totally the same as I sent earlier. 

*same as the screenshots

[36]

https://AnimeIsA.Dev/PoseidonAIO has unobfuscated exes
@Teken

Lol? This is clearly the bad src and even if it was, how do you get it?

---

You don't have any reverse engineering skill and totally messed up the leak

---

I have been seen excerpts of the petitioner performing exponential slander against my person to other's, in where fictitious statements are made and presented as being factual. Throughout my reply the tone will be best kept to an unbiased perspective to the extent of my capability of doing so.

Hi,

To be clear and concise; The reason as to why the petitioner was not sanctioned originally for the monetizing of someone else's work is due to the original developer not taking the initiative to actually release their project as a paid software being sold on our market. Hence meaning in all technicalities the petitioner could not be held in non-compliance. If the software were to have been marketed here prior to the unraveling of this case then that would result in a drastically different outcome for the petitioner.

The above excerpt should at least for the most part clear up any confusion revolving around the question of why the petitioner had never been sanctioned in the past. Furthermore, the petitioner has been terminated in the past but reason being for leeching. The petitioner contacted me through external media in which he inquired about the possibility to upgrade in order for sanction to be alleviated, to which I replied stating that it would be possible.

The petitioner's past history of infractions and/or non-compliance of our community guidelines/rules are vacant from any infractions being related to scamming, however that is not to say the publicly formed opinion/view of the petitioner is of equal value; Nonetheless, to the extent of my knowledge all legitimate claims of malicious and/or fraudulent business transactions in relation to the petitioner have yet to at this point provide satisfactory evidence of the claims which are made in accusation of the petitioner(of this case).

Overall this is the extent of what I am able to offer in terms of contribution to this case and the defense/offense of both parties involved without having to provide statements and/or claims which are stemming from a perspective which would be considered biased.

Hi, did you see the real unobfuscated versions or just the leaks sent by @AnimeIsADev

[7.755]

Do you want to show the staff “Real Unobfuscated Program”

 

[36]

Do you want to show the staff “Real Unobfuscated Program”

I think I already precised that I can't do this because of the new owner's restrictions, and you yourself know very well that your leaked source code is just a joke. And also SnowRade or Laxy should show their shop rules channel because apparently the tos was in shop rules and not in shop info.

---

And the report is about their ToS anyways which they refuse to show

[7.755]

Do you want to show the staff “Real Unobfuscated Program”

I think I already precised that I can't do this because of the new owner's restrictions, and you yourself know very well that your leaked source code is just a joke. And also SnowRade or Laxy should show their shop rules channel because apparently the tos was in shop rules and not in shop info.

---

And the report is about their ToS anyways which they refuse to show

You are simply wrong, accept that and hold this L