Scam report against @Dan

[810]

1. The first screenshot the worker showed is me giving him the "Verified" role as he was unable to verify: https://imgur.com/2BCieyL
2. The worker claimed that I made ASTRO say what was shown in this screenshot in exchange to give ASTRO his roles back which was a false accusation: https://imgur.com/HRY0N1P
3. The worker was getting paid 65% and he was fine with it but then he decided to increase it to 70% which I agreed on. -> The worker first worked in my server with 65% then increased to 70%: https://imgur.com/kckO6oThttps://imgur.com/2E91f6uhttps://imgur.com/Z8VsHhe
4. It's very obvious how hard the OP is trying to get the money as he got fired and can't make money anymore making up lies and deleting messages.
6. He's claiming that the screenshot is forged but he was snitched on and one of the workers showed me the screenshot (OP was referring to one of my worker's servers he was trying to get me banned from it): https://imgur.com/Hh5IPAm
The screenshot that he claims is the original one is more than obvious that it has missing messages as the person he was talking to mentioned "Raiding" just right after the deleted stuff.
 
Once again the ex-worker keeps making up lies and using screenshots are out of context with missing/deleted messages. I would gladly give @Liars my discord token, my backups, and also my telegram to see for himself

[374]

On the first screenshot, Dan says, "giving him the "Verified" role as he was unable to verify." 
Here is the full screenshot. I was already verified, and the user gave me the other roles, which were "Staff" + "Perms," which he related to the reply shown on the screenshot.
https://i.imgur.com/CAR32Xf.png
 
Dan denies the accusations about the ASTRO situation, where he banned him from the server cause ASTRO did an order in DMs: https://i.imgur.com/kulgF0W.png.
Meanwhile, here is him saying the opposite thing: https://i.imgur.com/flqxCea.png.
 
I was never OK with 65%. I agreed to that percentage because the user dragged me into accepting the deal by mentioning the Chipotle website: https://imgur.com/lXCVeOD.
After seeing that the website wouldn't be up anytime soon, I faced him for a 5% increase on my order's payout: https://i.imgur.com/G41LGn5.png.
 
He never suggested the payout increment to me whatsoever, and I was the one who did it. He is using the keyword payout like he was being generous. He is just a jerk who doesn't know how to do business, who was lucky enough to have me do things for him.
 
He is claiming that I'm not making any more money, while I work on two other more considerable servers than his and working on my service. Any customer who vouched for me on that server clearly shows the quality of my service, in contrast to others.
If he is too naive to accept it: https://i.imgur.com/sD52V7Q.png.
 
He is also claiming that his screenshot is the true one here.
But MemePC has been exposed as the true definition of a bitch, who sells his ass for money. The actual screenshot is here:
https://i.imgur.com/Wb24z1g.png
He is trying to give an idea of getting more members into his server.
While Dan's screenshot shows me saying we got to mass DM Dan's server. Mass DM and Raid don't look very similar to me on appearance. It's not my fault that MemePC is taking advantage of your retardness.
 
Pay me what you owe me, scumbag.

[374]

@Dan give Liars your Discord token

---

@Ping @Liars

[374]

This is a bump

[374]

This is a bump

---

@Ping

[2.603]

If the accused owes you money on any of the transactions you were meant to have received a percentage of, provide proof of this. Otherwise the accused is not responsible for any further compensation.

You also mention in your original post that you had attempted to undermine the accused, and how you expect compensation for your personal inventory stock whenever you had previously stated that the accused had in the past provided you with this same inventory out of their own pocket.

[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]

[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[374]

If the accused owes you money on any of the transactions you were meant to have received a percentage of, provide proof of this. Otherwise the accused is not responsible for any further compensation.

You also mention in your original post that you had attempted to undermine the accused, and how you expect compensation for your personal inventory stock whenever you had previously stated that the accused had in the past provided you with this same inventory out of their own pocket.

He owes me 5% on all past orders, as the standard payout in his server for his staff was 70% and above. I agreed to 65% as he was providing logs and had paid a developer to code a Chipotle panel to automatize customized orders. He then stopped providing logs and the website was never developed & I still kept getting paid 65% by him. What more proof do you need?
Here is the deal: https://i.imgur.com/lXCVeOD.png
He even admitted on thread that he stopped supplying us with logs.

[810]

That's a false claim, the standard payout in my server is not 70% and above. I'm really curious how this worker got this information when the worker doesn't know what are the deals I made with other staff this only proves how much of a lying and desperate person the worker is.

When I stopped providing logs I offered the worker 65% as shown in the screenshot he provided and he agreed to it and the website was not the reason he agreed to do 65%. He agreed to do 65% because he was greedy and wanted to work in my server so bad as my server was getting a very good amount of customers daily. 

Once again as a last remark when I stopped providing logs the worker had to choose between 65% or nothing as that was the highest I offered him and he could've refused but the worker agreed and proceeded the services regarding the chipotle orders till the moment the worker got caught exploiting and abusing hence that fired.

@MemePC can confirm this as he was offered the same exact deal since the beginning
He was offered 35% and I provided the logs then we switched to 65% and he was getting his own logs and he agreed and he was pleased with it and so the worker in this instance.
Then @MemePC wanted to renogioate an increment of 5% and I agreed to that same happend with the the worker in this instance turninrg the final payount per order to a 70% total.

The worker procedeed to do 70% for manual orders and never chose the 65% deal for the ones with the website, page that never been opened and if the worker still strongly sustains that the website was the reason he agreed to it then it must be proven as such becauce such deal never been taken in consideration by the worker himself droping his statements once again 
The only reason the worker agreed to the deal proposed was because that's the highest he was offered at that time and the 70% deal per order after the rise was the final payout and nothing more.

Stating that I owe 5% on all the past orders after the increment is toatly absurd and outta common sense, it's higly false and there is no evindece or proof as such as the first proposed deal was 65% per order and afterwards a rise of 5% was applied coming up to 70% total payout per order, deals to which I can bring withness to support my affirmations.

If the worker is asking for compensation from an old deal to all the past orders after the payout rise then this is complete none sense delirious claim showing how desperate the worker is to get free money out of an invalid report. 
The worker is basically a joke in this state of topic , basically asking 5% for all the past orders after the rise, like you have a job at mcdonaldas and you get a bigger salary and then you ask your boss to give you the money rised from all the past services as well, like do you even hear yourself.

Then in this instance I have every right to ask for a compensation myself, for every order that the worker wasn't able to sell causing , time loss , money loss and the customer to close the ticket and for trying to ruining a $450 deal I had with one of my member workers.