[3 FOR FREE] [SERVICE] MANUAL CRYPT OF EXE FILES. DOC/XLS EXPLOIT

[13]

Service of crypting EXE files. Cost 25$ (FUD 0/26)
 

• We encrypt .Net / Native / EXE files.
  
• Twice a day new stub.
  
• Any types of malicious and not so files.
  
• Scanning on a paid scanner after crypt.
  
• Payment after checking the functionality of the file.
  
• Additional functions such as gluing, startup, etc. are available!
  

.Doc/xls EXPLOIT (DOC, Excel)

Service of exploiting your .EXE with .doc или .xls

• As a result you get a fully working .doc or .xls file.
  
• When you open a document, the main file is loaded and automatically launched.
  
• Any types of malicious and not so files.
  
• Silent doc is also available. [No macro].
  
• Silent doc  works in 2007-2016 offices.
  
• Long time FUD file.
  

Price for one .doc or .xls  [MACRO] 30$.
Price for one silent .doc (NO MACRO) - 100$

Other extensions are available on request.


Contact:
Telegram: @Cryptexxx
Jabber: [email protected] (OTR ONLY)


The topic has also been tested on neighboring boards, reviews are in the same place. Ready to get tested here.


Warning! There are many fakes in the telegram. DO NOT get fooled! Real telegram @Cryptexxx


First 3 crypts free for review [1/3]

[45]

Suspicious

[511]

Received a test for the crypting service, first off its not being crypted in the slightest its a simple dropper and it drops directly to disk. Which is a big no-no. The author hosts on a public pasting site. At scantime this should be fine, I'm not shocked that at scantime it would get zero results however at runtime it will get flagged if you're using any malware that gets detections to begin with. 

Runtime Results

This is honestly not worth buying (haven't tried his "exploits") but the crypting portion is 100% not worth it.

[13]

Received a test for the crypting service, first off its not being crypted in the slightest its a simple dropper and it drops directly to disk. Which is a big no-no. The author hosts on a public pasting site. At scantime this should be fine, I'm not shocked that at scantime it would get zero results however at runtime it will get flagged if you're using any malware that gets detections to begin with. 

Runtime Results

This is honestly not worth buying (haven't tried his "exploits") but the crypting portion is 100% not worth it.

Why you didnt check on dyncheck or real machine? Its 100% Bypass WD on scantime and runtime. Its also bypass almost any other AV on runtime. Real scantime: 100% FUD. Real runtime: ~ 4 detects. So 2 free crypts for review left

[511]

Received a test for the crypting service, first off its not being crypted in the slightest its a simple dropper and it drops directly to disk. Which is a big no-no. The author hosts on a public pasting site. At scantime this should be fine, I'm not shocked that at scantime it would get zero results however at runtime it will get flagged if you're using any malware that gets detections to begin with. 

Runtime Results

This is honestly not worth buying (haven't tried his "exploits") but the crypting portion is 100% not worth it.

Why you didnt check on dyncheck or real machine? Its 100% Bypass WD on scantime and runtime. Its also bypass almost any other AV on runtime. Real scantime: 100% FUD. Real runtime: ~ 4 detects. So 2 free crypts for review left

https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/3...19b63e254b
stop calling this FUD it will bypass scantime at most (not sure about virtualization), and for runtime it merely drops an executable TO DISK so your chances of getting past AV with heavily used malware is slim.

[672]

Unfortunately, you're faker.

[13]

Unfortunately, you're faker.

Faker? Rly? Im giving 3 free crypts of exe files so u can test it for review, ur choice :)

[13]

This is a bump