NEED @KSZ to view this - Problems with the forum

[11]

Hello, there is rule against "doxing" c.to members, numerous people have been banned for this and if all of the users who have been banned for this will hold, then any active "DOX" of an "unbanned" user should be removed immediately from the forum, or the rule is invalid.

The user @Ping , Has an active DOX of @ANG and it should be removed, or the user @Ping should be banned,

Posting anything public information that could be considered a dox on an active unbanned member is stricly against the rules, if this is not too be corrected then something is wrong.

This is not have anything personal to do with @ANG , He is just the example at hand here.

Multiple people have been banned for this, It is backwards for anyone under any circumstance to have active DOX posted on an unbanned member, regardless of the persons feelings/position as OTHER people are still BANNED because of this exact thing.

If @Ping is not to be banned or the DOX removed, everyone who has been banned for "DOXING c.to members" shall be unbanned.

[17.547]

User @ANG has no issues with it.

why do you have issues?

and dox was released when ANG was banned.

 1st spot available

PRIVATEALPS.NET - Offshore Cloud Services - Dedicated Servers - TOR Friendly - DMCA Ignored 

Instant Deploy

Telegram : @PrivateAlps

Paid Advts Above----> I don't own above linked services, contact respective ownesr of the services for queries and issues

[11]

doesn't matter if the user has no issues with it

Nor does it matter if it was released while he was banned

The user is unbanned and active on the forum, The dox shall either be removed or the person hosting the thread punished.

If you have any other view of this you are wrong. It is clearly stated in the rules and numerous users have been banned for this. Allowing someone such as this user to maintain such a thread on someone who is unbanned violates the rules.
If you violate the rules you are subject to punishment, just because he holds a meaningless title does not mean it should circumvent him from penalty.

[2.603]

Hello,

I alone am not to decide the action(s) taken in regards to whether or not this content is to be removed.

If the decision is made to remove the content, then it shall be done. Otherwise, the content is static until further notice.

I personally do not have any qualms with the user, if you had read the thread replies my indifference is made clear.

[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]

[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[11]

again none of that matters

what matters is that it is a rule, you guys expect users to follow said rules, if the staff/support are not then that is not setting a good example

the user is unbanned on the forum, this should reflect what should happen to the dox that is "static"

1. Dox gets removed
2. Host of the thread receives punishment, due to all of the other users who have been banned for this type of behaviour

If neither of these happen then the rules mean nothing, either the thread needs to be removed, or the user needs to be punished and the thread removed on top of that, it is clearly breaking the rules having it posted on here publicly when the user is not banned, regardless if they were banned previously, If a permanent ban can be revoked, then the repercussions of what the user did to gain his DOX posted should also be revoked. it is only fair

[11]

@KSZ


please provide feedback on this

[78]

@KSZ


please provide feedback on this

@KSZ stop this toxic member

I'm not selling anything on cracked.io/shop/discord  
 

[5.930]

This issue has been solved.

visit my links

----------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------

expiration 12/2/2024
----------------------------------------------
Make money off cracked : Beginning

telegram @itstheart do not deal if no confirmation on direct message on forums