Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!



 18557

SCAM REPORT AGAINST @RAINBOW

by Team073 - 30 March, 2023 - 10:36 PM
This post is by a banned member (Liars) - Unhide
Liars  
Staff
18.843
Posts
129
Threads
Staff Team
5 Years of service
#25
@rainbow Pay him the $270.00 within 24 hours.
[Image: Banner.gif]
 
AD by  @GoodEatsB4U exp 8/12/2024
 
 
[Image: 3KRc17x.gif]
 
Ad by @Bears - expiring 12/4/2024

FOR SALE CONTACT ME VIA DM OR WHISPER

https://spyderproxy.com & https://wehost.gg/ are the best proxies & hosting providere

Ad by @- expiring 11/17/2024
This post is by a banned member (Surveillance) - Unhide
276
Posts
58
Threads
4 Years of service
#26
(This post was last modified: 28 May, 2023 - 08:25 PM by Surveillance. Edited 1 time in total.)
(28 May, 2023 - 07:37 PM)Liars Wrote: Show More
@rainbow Pay him the $270.00 within 24 hours.

Check your telegram DMs as this case isnt over yet because proofs were lost but found again & submitted late with the help of @Darkness who had them
Surveillance's Public PGP Key
[Image: pKERrrM.gif]
This post is by a banned member (Ping) - Unhide
Ping  
Staff
2.603
Posts
84
Threads
Staff Team
6 Years of service
#27
Upon a thorough reevaluation of the dispute, it has been determined that Rainbow is not culpable in this matter. The original poster (OP) initiated this thread on behalf of another user, "notbaba", which is a practice not permitted according to our forum rules. This fact alone invalidates the dispute.

In a group conversation, "notbaba" stated: "No, we are not the same person. I am the one who had this issue with Rainbow and Elation. Tim is my partner and we used his name to open the dispute because I don't have forum accounts and the one I created, Rainbow gave me a -6 reputation." This admission, confirmed by the OP, indicates that the individual claiming to have been scammed did not personally open the dispute.

Moreover, "notbaba" contradicted himself by initially claiming not to have a forum account, but then referring to an account that was negatively impacted by Rainbow. This inconsistency raises questions about the credibility of his claims.

Given these circumstances, any evidence or personal experiences shared by the OP cannot be considered relevant to this dispute. The OP cannot represent the perspective of the purchaser, and therefore, any recounting of events on their behalf must be disregarded.
[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]

[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)