04 January, 2023 - 01:26 AM
Permit me to commence by drawing attention to several fundamental deficiencies which are manifested in the present altercation.
Exhibit A - Depicts an image of the Bitcoin address "bc1qa69fveyzac498p3qhsmmkcp24n98uk3j28gjvt," to which the defendant maintains that the plaintiff transferred funds.
A comprehensive examination of the applicable blockchain reveals that this address has not participated in any transactions, with a current value of 0 BTC and a total of 0 BTC received and sent.
A comprehensive examination of the applicable blockchain reveals that this address has not participated in any transactions, with a current value of 0 BTC and a total of 0 BTC received and sent.
Exhibit B - Encompasses a statement in which the plaintiff asserts that the defendant has perpetrated a fraudulent scheme, defrauding the plaintiff of the sum of $300.00 USD.
However, this claim is contradicted by a separate statement in which the plaintiff denies having paid this amount.
However, this claim is contradicted by a separate statement in which the plaintiff denies having paid this amount.
Exhibit C - Features a statement in which the plaintiff contradicts their own assertions,
stating that the defendant provided access to the cpanel for the purpose of downloading files,
yet also claiming that the defendant failed to transmit the files.
stating that the defendant provided access to the cpanel for the purpose of downloading files,
yet also claiming that the defendant failed to transmit the files.
Exhibit D - Consists of screenshots submitted by the plaintiff which do not depict any TXID indicating a payment to the defendant.
Instead, these images depict the aforementioned Bitcoin address, which has not received any funds.
Instead, these images depict the aforementioned Bitcoin address, which has not received any funds.
Exhibit E - Includes a quotation from the defendant stating that they delivered a completed product to the plaintiff,
who has acknowledged the satisfactory nature of this product. However, the plaintiff also asserts that they did not receive the files,
who has acknowledged the satisfactory nature of this product. However, the plaintiff also asserts that they did not receive the files,
despite admitting to having access to the cpanel from which they were intended to be downloaded.
In summary, the evidence presented in this thread does not support the plaintiff's allegations of having been defrauded for the stated sum.
The defendant's assertion of having completed a transaction and delivered a satisfactory product is corroborated by the plaintiff's own statements.
It appears that the plaintiff has perjured themselves in this dispute and may be attempting to perpetrate a fraudulent scheme against the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant is not responsible for any form of indemnification or reparation.
The defendant's assertion of having completed a transaction and delivered a satisfactory product is corroborated by the plaintiff's own statements.
It appears that the plaintiff has perjured themselves in this dispute and may be attempting to perpetrate a fraudulent scheme against the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant is not responsible for any form of indemnification or reparation.
Dispute Resolved.
---------------------------------
Exhibit Archive:
---------------------------------
Exhibit Archive:
Spoiler:
- Exhibit A
- Image depicting the bitcoin address "bc1qa69fveyzac498p3qhsmmkcp24n98uk3j28gjvt" which you had supposedly sent funds to.
- https://prnt.sc/ZnMQXaqwGX6g (Your own image taken from the thread)
- https://prnt.sc/ZnMQXaqwGX6g (Your own image taken from the thread)
- This address has transacted 0 times on the Bitcoin blockchain.
- It has received a total of 0.00000000 BTC $0.00 and has sent a total of 0.00000000 BTC $0.00 The current value of this address is 0.00000000 BTC $0.00.
- Image depicting the bitcoin address "bc1qa69fveyzac498p3qhsmmkcp24n98uk3j28gjvt" which you had supposedly sent funds to.
- Exhibit B
- Statement claiming that the seller has scammed you $300.00 USD.
- Statement contradicting your original claim of having ever paid the seller this amount
- Exhibit C
- Statement in which you contradict yourself in the same sentence.
- You admit that the seller had provided you access to the cpanel in order for you to download the files.
- In the same sentence you are claiming the seller never had sent you the files.
- In the same sentence you are claiming the seller never had sent you the files.
- Exhibit D
- You have supplied screenshots in your original post, and none of these pictures are depicting any TXID of having sent a payment to the seller.
- They do however, depict the same bitcoin address ("bc1qa69fveyzac498p3qhsmmkcp24n98uk3j28gjvt") given to you by the seller.
- This would imply that the funds you are attesting as having been scammed would have been sent to this address, it is the one both you and the seller have now posted.
- This address has never received funds.
- This would imply that the funds you are attesting as having been scammed would have been sent to this address, it is the one both you and the seller have now posted.
- You have supplied screenshots in your original post, and none of these pictures are depicting any TXID of having sent a payment to the seller.
- Exhibit E
- Here you are quoting the seller's statement of having delivered you a working product that you confirmed as having been satisfactory.
- You do not deny that you were given a finished product. Actually, you confirm that you were.
- You also again claim to never having been delivered the files, yet you have admitted to having access to the cpanel to which you were meant to download these files from.
[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]
[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.
[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.