Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!



 1431

The issue with user-group chasing spammers

by Yooko - 23 February, 2020 - 07:40 PM
This post is by a banned member (Yooko) - Unhide
Yooko  
Retired Staff
1.096
Posts
116
Threads
6 Years of service
#1
Intro:

What I mean by "user-group chasing spammers"
  • People with the goal of obtaining a requirement based usergroup by spamming literally anything.

This is also based on my own personal observance of the forum so please feel free to disagree or agree with what I say. 


The issue:

For now I will be using the cracking section as an example. 

Combos:
  • Irrelevant click-bait i.e "1M UHQ PRIVATE #37" when in fact they'e absolutely damn not.
  • Reposting old threads. Yes you can find people reposting combos from other members daily
  • No proof or quality assurance for "Private" combos. 

Accounts:
  • Fake hits/accounts. I.e 6000x Netflix premium. Either reposted or direct lines from random combo. [1. Note below]

Proxies:
  • Idk why this section exists ngl.
  • Fake Luminati proxies. It takes 2 seconds to check so stop lying mfs
  • "Paid" proxies spammed in 3 different threads from propaste.io
  • Rarely actually "checked"


Extra discussion and notes:

[1] Some users do legitimately post thousands of working accounts. Just very rare.

 
I am raising this an issue because I believe the forum is heading in a good direction with quality assurance in the leaks/money section. 

Grinding for usergroups should require a lot of real contribution. Not spam

It is demotivating for hard working contributors who spend tremendous amounts of time with quality assurance of content they post
for the community.  I can easily post 400million useless combos in a day but I never will because they're fucking ULQ.


Solution ideas: 

Introduce rules on click-bait, want to claim the combos are UHQ PRIVATE? 
Post an antipublic screenshot. If users can't provide such evidence then they should not be allowed
to use those titles. 

Disciplinary action taken against people posting fake accounts. 

Section mods for quality assurance. Still allowing the flow of threads without an approval system 
but checking threads for evidence of their claims and to reduce the "1M COMBOS #321" spam threads
that get posted in rapid succession that are often the same combos just randomized. 


Conclusion:

Usergroups should be earned by quality not quantity. Spam to win is retarded. 

Staff already increase requirements for usergroups so that is a plus but stil
you can spam your cock off to get them easily. 


The forum is already heading in the direction of quality over quantity so the cracking section should
also be monitored. 

Seeing users spam really shitty content for likes demotivates hard working contributors who spend a 
fair amount of time producing their content. Which can lead to these users degrading their content for likes.

I am curious for everyone's views on this and sorry for the long thread ty for reading Pepeclap
This post is by a banned member (Zombie) - Unhide
Zombie  
Retired Staff
1.313
Posts
18
Threads
6 Years of service
#2
"Usergroups should be earned by quality not quantity. Spam to win is retarded." pepeokay
ONLY DISCORD: zombie#7550 (ID: 785571908267671613)
ONLY TELEGRAM: @zombie_dev


I DONT DO MM. CONFIRM ALWAYS VIA PM ON CRACKED!
This post is by a banned member (Pickleback) - Unhide
This post is by a banned member (Pruned110902) - Unhide
8.411
Posts
789
Threads
5 Years of service
#4
(23 February, 2020 - 07:54 PM)floraiN Wrote: Show More
(23 February, 2020 - 07:40 PM)Yooko Wrote: Show More
Usergroups should be earned by quality not quantity. Spam to win is retarded. 

Staff already increase requirements for usergroups so that is a plus but stil
you can spam your cock off to get them easily. 

Thats why there has been the additional requirement for reputations added for Godlike and Heaven. So your thread is mostly based on that, but this requirement does already exists. So no one gets anything by just spamming alone

You should make a new rule for splitting
 
 
[Image: image.png]
Quality Handcrafted Accounts Verified For Your Needs

This post is by a banned member (Yooko) - Unhide
Yooko  
Retired Staff
1.096
Posts
116
Threads
6 Years of service
#5
(23 February, 2020 - 07:54 PM)floraiN Wrote: Show More
(23 February, 2020 - 07:40 PM)Yooko Wrote: Show More
Usergroups should be earned by quality not quantity. Spam to win is retarded. 

Staff already increase requirements for usergroups so that is a plus but stil
you can spam your cock off to get them easily. 

Thats why there has been the additional requirement for reputations added for Godlike and Heaven. So your thread is mostly based on that, but this requirement does already exists. So no one gets anything by just spamming alone

Yes I love that the requirements have been raised higher. Still rep4rep is rampant and easy unfortunately  Pepe
This post is by a banned member (CiscoRamon) - Unhide
1.870
Posts
447
Threads
5 Years of service
#6
Maybe I am just a noob who is not doing it the correct way but whenever I post something, I make sure they are they are proofread before the submit button is clicked but somehow people post accounts for different platforms at the same time.
I DO NOT OWN ANY SERVICE.
IF ANYONE CLAIMS THE SAME, IGNORE THEM AND DO NOT ENGAGE.


[Image: TWwziN2.gif]
_________________________________________


BEWARE OF IMPERSONATORS. ALWAYS CONFIRM ON THE FORUM
This post is by a banned member (Yooko) - Unhide
Yooko  
Retired Staff
1.096
Posts
116
Threads
6 Years of service
#7
(This post was last modified: 23 February, 2020 - 08:07 PM by Yooko.)
(23 February, 2020 - 07:59 PM)floraiN Wrote: Show More
Should we maybe also add a rule when someone is allowed to press the like button and when not? You dont want tons of nonsense rules and restrictions. I believe the forum is great the way it is, people will always find topics to complain about

I agree the forum is great. My main concern is users being able to post content that is illegitimate content. Likes are not that big of a concern its rather the issue of quality and spam. 

Still all based on personal observation and I appreciate your time
This post is by a banned member (xLd) - Unhide

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)