im neither on your side neither @Darkness 's
first of all i believe there should be a 14 day ban whoever responds at scam reports that are not directly involved(even though i have replied myself once while not involved)
why i say that? imagine, my scam report had 45 REPLIES, all with mixed opinions that most didnt matter, in result @Darkness resided with the guy who opened scam report. After i pmed him with all details, it was reversed and solved in my favor.
Which means one thing, HE cant take all that crap from others, its just impossible especially on subjects he doesnt know of much.
yes i see that also makes sense. but the thing is he didn't provide any proof I was the snitch. meanwhile im working my ass off providing proof I wasn't. maybe it was a mistake afterall.
and also darkness i see that your on the thread. remove my dwc, i no longer wanna be apart of this mess.
lol same with me, the guy had literally no grounds on the scam report, he just claimed that it had ''similarities'', but you see, 45 replies is a lot(i have seen threads with 50 but ye xd)
also im neutral since the ban rule is not applied yet and i almost lost my rep cause of blind judgement caused by those randy replies
im neither on your side neither @Darkness 's
first of all i believe there should be a 14 day ban whoever responds at scam reports that are not directly involved(even though i have replied myself once while not involved)
why i say that? imagine, my scam report had 45 REPLIES, all with mixed opinions that most didnt matter, in result @Darkness resided with the guy who opened scam report. After i pmed him with all details, it was reversed and solved in my favor.
Which means one thing, HE cant take all that crap from others, its just impossible especially on subjects he doesnt know of much.
I totally agree with you, sometimes because of the really excessive information, one can be really really confused about who's right.
You can like the post if it helped and have a good day.
im neither on your side neither @Darkness 's
first of all i believe there should be a 14 day ban whoever responds at scam reports that are not directly involved(even though i have replied myself once while not involved)
why i say that? imagine, my scam report had 45 REPLIES, all with mixed opinions that most didnt matter, in result @Darkness resided with the guy who opened scam report. After i pmed him with all details, it was reversed and solved in my favor.
Which means one thing, HE cant take all that crap from others, its just impossible especially on subjects he doesnt know of much.
I totally agree with you, sometimes because of the really excessive information, one can be really really confused about who's right.
its not that only, its just also, that there are friends (totally randies(not involved)) that actually reply in order to protect the other nigga.
i will include names cause im pissed. (it wasnt on my scam report but on other) @Akimor with @MoviToof, @Vietnamese opens scam report vs @Akimor, @MoviToof protects him with grounds being, THE LINK WAS PUBLIC(which btw akimor knew since on the sales thread the database name was seen(mistake of @Vietnamese)) but ofc, @MoviToof found it before the sales thread but didnt know that @Akimor bought? idk long story short after that scam report, i have seen @MoviToof and @Akimor protecting each other without having really involvement to each scam report occuring.
yeah i agree with all of you. admins should take there time with scam reports and not rush it. i understand that they are busy but false accusing is not ok.
yeah i agree with all of you. admins should take there time with scam reports and not rush it. i understand that they are busy but false accusing is not ok.
i explained again, the false accusing comes from others, replying to the subject, IN MY OPINION make scam reports readable by those 2 individuals only, (incase 3 then 3) so others cant reply. its that simple, you are opening a scam report vs a guy, and you see his homies replying for him how would you feel?
yeah i agree with all of you. admins should take there time with scam reports and not rush it. i understand that they are busy but false accusing is not ok.
i explained again, the false accusing comes from others, replying to the subject, IN MY OPINION make scam reports readable by those 2 individuals only, (incase 3 then 3) so others cant reply. its that simple, you are opening a scam report vs a guy, and you see his homies replying for him how would you feel?
still not a valid excuse to falsely accuse. corgi didnt provide any proof that I leaked the download and i still reaped the punishment.
yeah i agree with all of you. admins should take there time with scam reports and not rush it. i understand that they are busy but false accusing is not ok.
i explained again, the false accusing comes from others, replying to the subject, IN MY OPINION make scam reports readable by those 2 individuals only, (incase 3 then 3) so others cant reply. its that simple, you are opening a scam report vs a guy, and you see his homies replying for him how would you feel?
still not a valid excuse to falsely accuse. corgi didnt provide any proof that I leaked the download and i still reaped the punishment.
obviously its not an excuse, but i was victim of it, so thats why im telling ya, what mostly caused it, but ye ofc i agree with you as well.
and i almost lost my rep cause of blind judgement caused by those randy replies
![[Image: 7e1mkUJ.png]](https://i.imgur.com/7e1mkUJ.png)
how would you feel?
