Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!



 1422

auto ban users who have -100 rep

by Chiya - 30 November, 2021 - 08:42 PM
This post is by a banned member (Virus) - Unhide
Virus  
Supreme
1.475
Posts
326
Threads
3 Years of service
#9
Gang repping is a thing right? Don't forget people that have -15 powers can literally just tell their friends to -rep this guy to get him banned. I'm sorry, but this is a awful suggestion.
[Image: signature.gif]
intelfetch.net

NO LONGER OWN THE USER 'vir.us' ON DISCORD. DM ME IF YOU NEED MY NEW ONE
UHQ RDP's here https://wehost.gg/panel/aff.php?aff=2

JOIN FOR INBOXED UNRAPED FA https://t.me/nfafashop
This post is by a banned member (MintTea) - Unhide
MintTea  
Registered
30
Posts
5
Threads
2 Years of service
#10
The potential for abuse is too high and for that reason I feel that manual bans would be the way to go.
This post is by a banned member (Chiya) - Unhide
This post is by a banned member (GoldenLeaf) - Unhide
113
Posts
11
Threads
4 Years of service
#12
But that would be something like an easy way of getting someone banned. For my account for example it would be relatively easy to get it at -100 rep if youre trying to, also because you can re-use already created Bot-accounts every 24hrs. Ig It would easily be possible to realise an automated banning service, even with CAPTCHA.
 [Image: godlike.png]
This post is by a banned member (Chiya) - Unhide
This post is by a banned member (poceez) - Unhide
poceez  
Registered
37
Posts
6
Threads
2 Years of service
#14
Awful Idea. People in SB can literally ban people if they got 'enough' Friends.. Not a good Idea to let the Community decide who to ban and who's allowed it stay.
[Image: 6Ls+oIfSXxBWuK30Vp23OWdYTmtwRGQuZ2lm]

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: