13 September, 2020 - 12:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 13 September, 2020 - 12:31 AM by arrowbins.)
@Her 's justification is that he thinks @Error69 helped in leaking it. Lmao @Her needs to present proof showing @Error69 is guilty and not the other way around. He paid for the checker he didnt pay to plead for his honesty, as long as her doesnt have proof and @Error69 is banned from the checker, this is a plain SCAM.
I am very close to opening a scam report myself, the checker is always down and rarely works, and the seller's explanation is sorry i rushed it. Big joke
I am very close to opening a scam report myself, the checker is always down and rarely works, and the seller's explanation is sorry i rushed it. Big joke