AWARD TO RESPECT REAL CONTRIBUTERS (FT. CRACKED BECOMING NEW INSTAGRAM)

[998]

Grab a coffee because it is more important than Trignometry
So cracked administration made several ways to identify or i say differentiate between LQ and HQ members but gays fucked all nowdays in every section what we can observe is either spamming farming likes or just gay thread just like in INSTAGRAM bitches getting famous with posting 15 sec reels but the real creators who doing hardwork and posting quality content no one watching them

Why this Thread?
To launch a special award by which any member who will get x amount of likes in y amount of time will be eligible for this award (NON -TRADABLE AWARD)

How this will help?
This will seperate those members who are really posting quality threads, long knowledgeable threads, and those who just posting 1-1 accounts, news headlines etc and getting thousands of reps and likes

There are people with 1K+ reps 15K+ likes but literally just spamming accounts and posting nothing but shit threads
Other Hand there are people with <200 reps <1K likes but posting really hard knowledgeable shits and valuable shits

1. Heaven no more help to identify which member is really valuable and HQ because gays easily acheiving by farming likes
2. Reps no more help to identify trusted members or HQ members, people doing rep4rep and also getting rep by fool auidence 
Example:- a LQ person like @blackycracky got 300+ reps for no reasons imagine lol
3. Likes no more help to identify which member really posting good threads
4. No. of threads award is aslo useless because again spamming
5. MOTM/Badges:- Dont make me speak things many will get hurt(you know the reality)

This award will have no loopholes and people will really have to work hard to get it do their research etc and this will help to identify whether a member really posted some HQ shit or not  

More no.of such awards= More HQ

@KSZ Go through this i wasted my 30 mins 

---

Please come with proper reasons if you reject this

​​​​​​Edit:- 

My simple last question:- When we can give badges MOTM Reps to people who don't even deserve it why can't we launch a award as a "symbol" to those who posted some hq content or a better content than spamming or a more interesting content???

[3.754]

 Alphabin.cc   #1 Paste Site

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

[150]

+1  i support this

Selling Sig Space

[2.535]

I agree that there needs to be a better way to determine quality from shit, but I feel like we need something more thought-out than an award

joe biden can gargle it

[17.548]

Well, personally for me, There is nothing LQ and HQ in terms of members.

Everyone who is contributing in some way in the forum is a contributor.

A guy who purchased supreme rank also contributes whether he never commented or made a thread or talk in SB.


- X amount of Likes in y amount of time (abusable) anyone can do that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
My observation
The people who are not getting recognized should start communicating in SB so members know about them.
Their profile isn't growing because they are not participating in a conversation or getting connected with the community.

Reps were never helpful. The majority of the people had used reps as a thing of being trusted, and later they ended up in exit scams.

Yes, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the MOTM process. I wish there would have been something based on contribution in the forum rather than being famous in the community and getting easy nominations and votes.

---

Yes, Changes are needed. But it shouldn't for some award.

 1st spot available

PRIVATEALPS.NET - Offshore Cloud Services - Dedicated Servers - TOR Friendly - DMCA Ignored 

Instant Deploy

Telegram : @PrivateAlps

Paid Advts Above----> I don't own above linked services, contact respective ownesr of the services for queries and issues

[998]

Well, personally for me, There is nothing LQ and HQ in terms of members.

Everyone who is contributing in some way in the forum is a contributor.

A guy who purchased supreme rank also contributes whether he never commented or made a thread or talk in SB.


- X amount of Likes in y amount of time (abusable) anyone can do that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
My observation
The people who are not getting recognized should start communicating in SB so members know about them.
Their profile isn't growing because they are not participating in a conversation or getting connected with the community.

Reps were never helpful. The majority of the people had used reps as a thing of being trusted, and later they ended up in exit scams.

Yes, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the MOTM process. I wish there would have been something based on contribution in the forum rather than being famous in the community and getting easy nominations and votes.

---

Yes, Changes are needed. But it shouldn't for some award.

That's why I asked you to review because you always post being neutral

I understand there's nothing like LQ and HQ but still we can't put everyone under same roof who really spent his time finding and digging any information and the one who just talked in sb and bought a rank

I know award not sufficient but it will play a major role because there will be a award a "symbol" on profile which will show this member really posted some hard shit for the forum

And later we can announce more rewards but for now I think this is best solution

A award no one can get not even owner
No one can buy
Something only can be achieved

---

Well, personally for me, There is nothing LQ and HQ in terms of members.

Everyone who is contributing in some way in the forum is a contributor.

A guy who purchased supreme rank also contributes whether he never commented or made a thread or talk in SB.



- X amount of Likes in y amount of time (abusable) anyone can do that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
My observation
The people who are not getting recognized should start communicating in SB so members know about them.
Their profile isn't growing because they are not participating in a conversation or getting connected with the community.

Reps were never helpful. The majority of the people had used reps as a thing of being trusted, and later they ended up in exit scams.

Yes, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the MOTM process. I wish there would have been something based on contribution in the forum rather than being famous in the community and getting easy nominations and votes.

---

Yes, Changes are needed. But it shouldn't for some award.

People can't abuse that criteria
Of x amount of likes in y amount of time

Because
1. They can't ask for likes or ban
2. Giveaway don't come under likes
3. The criteria of likes will obv not 10-15 but more and time won't be 2 years but less

[2.441]

Bro, i was thinking the same ting for years now. Some people just lick ass in shoutbox, get reps for it and then easy exit scam as customers think they are "HQ" and "Trusted" as they have a lot of reps/likes.

And yeah, there is no real quality control over the posts, some people just spam shitty udemy courses or just copy pasting old and outdated "Tutorials" that doesn't work for months, but they are to lazy to test them themselfs before posting it but they still getting mad likes for it lol.

I mean yeah, people are contributing and all that, but contribution and being HQ is two seperate things.

+2 for this ting, it would make c.to a better place fr.

[658]

I agree, I'm a spammer and I approve this.