General Suggestions

[1.870]

I have been spending a lot of my time on the forum in the recent days and observed few things where few improvements can be made. Not necessary improvements but can be tried if the staff want.

LEECHING
1. Just like the porn leaks in the leaks section cannot harvest likes, I think Proxies section in the checking section can do the same as well. If Staff want, the proxy threads can be excluded as threads while judging a leecher.
2. The Registered/Grey members should not been given access to post in monetizing techniques as most that come are reposts or referral links.

VOUCH COPIES
3. There should be a check on VC hunters. Maybe a thing such as one vouch copy per week for Godlikes and 2 per week for Heaven. Few members have been just using the opportunity to gather free stuff.
4. Efforts should be made to include relevant reviews. Things like font color or alignment seem pretty irrelevant.
5. Ebooks (that are being sold) should be checked by Staff for very common methods. PLAGIARISM test should NOT be used as a method to check for authenticity or effectiveness of an eBook.

STAFF SITUATION
6. I know there was a recruitment carried out few days ago but at certain times the forum does look shorthanded specially while maintaining decorum in the shoutbox. IN NO WAY I AM BLAMING ANY MODERATOR, the forum has expanded and with the ongoing pandemic situation or real life situation more important things should always take priority.
                        There can be two ways to handle this in my opinion: A) Appoint an unbiased SB Mod or B) Give the SMods the permission to SB ban for maximum of 1 hour.

FEW EXTERNAL SUGGESTIONS MADE
7. There should be some rules about people selling Azure. 

You may have come across many of the said suggestions before but these ones are my own opinion and in no way compilation of other suggestions.
Constructive criticisms are welcomed as always. Thank you.

I DO NOT OWN ANY SERVICE.
IF ANYONE CLAIMS THE SAME, IGNORE THEM AND DO NOT ENGAGE.


_________________________________________


BEWARE OF IMPERSONATORS. ALWAYS CONFIRM ON THE FORUM

[2.081]

Hi @CiscoRamon Amazing thread!

So in order

1. About Leeching , leecher already got a warning when posting too much (don't have the exact amount of post)

2.Excellent idea ! Posting proxies is way too much of a farm-like situation !

3. I'm not sure about that one, limiting people to access section is not really a good idea. Some new people could be interested in upgrading their accounts after seing some monetizing methods, or wish to see more without having to reply on every thread.

4. I agree, there is people VC hunting , but i don't know how a check could be done on that ! I think this just about the community, if you see someone VC hunters just report their profiles and the staff will deal about it :)

5. Don't agree, i prefer the possibility to do the review as you want, forcing people to make same review is not really a good idea. Creativity when coming about reviews is better (in my opinion)

6. Checking every Ebooks would be , i think , too much work , for the mod or section mods ! Maybe with more SMODS ?

7. That idea is really good !  Both of them really !  Ability for SMOD  to ban for 1 hour would be easier for the staff tho !


Thanks for that thread , hope people will take to time to read it :)


PsykoZ

a retired fatcat

[1.870]

@PsykoZ Always glad to see a well made suggestions. I'm sure the higher authorities can use their judgement and improverise on our suggestions and come up with something.

I did remove the warning point as you mentioned that it's already happening.

My bad that I wasn't clear with limiting access part but I meant to limit access from making threads but can view and reply. However, your point still holds true.


Also for the review part, didn't mean a strict layout but something can be laid out. People mentioning the font color and stuff. I think people care about the result and methods.

By reviewing eBooks I referred to ones being sold not every eBook that is being posted. My bad, wasn't clear again.

Your points do make sense. Thanks for your effort and time.

I DO NOT OWN ANY SERVICE.
IF ANYONE CLAIMS THE SAME, IGNORE THEM AND DO NOT ENGAGE.


_________________________________________


BEWARE OF IMPERSONATORS. ALWAYS CONFIRM ON THE FORUM

[17.547]

Nice thread @CiscoRamon with good suggestions

@PsykoZ You explained points nicely smart big brain

 1st spot available

PRIVATEALPS.NET - Offshore Cloud Services - Dedicated Servers - TOR Friendly - DMCA Ignored 

Instant Deploy

Telegram : @PrivateAlps

Paid Advts Above----> I don't own above linked services, contact respective ownesr of the services for queries and issues

[29]

nice suggestion guyz

[18.843]

I do agree with the proxy stuff. People just spam proxyscrape proxies all over. Get instant likes. 


Other that, I also agree with @PsykoZ

 

AD by  @GoodEatsB4U exp 8/12/2024

 

 

 

Ad by @Bears - expiring 12/4/2024

FOR SALE CONTACT ME VIA DM OR WHISPER

https://spyderproxy.com & https://wehost.gg/ are the best proxies & hosting providere

Ad by @- expiring 11/17/2024

[1.098]

1. Same as psyko

2. YES PLEASE IM TIRED OF SEEIGN MFS GETTING GODLIKE IN 2 WEEKS CUZ THEY SPAMMED PROXIES (@Heihachi jkjkjk)

3. I have a divided opinion here.
Yes, you are taking the monetizing section away from them, but they usually fill it with LQ shit for likes.
I'd propose that they can comment and get methods, but not upload them until they get a few likes.

4. Tbh, idc about people who VC hunt, they did things to get their rank and i see no bad part, when a reputable member vouchs my product (Honestly), If every word that comes out of their mouth is honest about the product, i have no issue with them doing VC hunt.

5. Agree with psykoZ

6. I think checking the ebooks is a good idea, too many shitty ebook makers, pretty sure Smods can handle it well. (They dont gotta test the ebook, just look at it and see if its a good ebook)

7. (What psykoZ said)

[2.716]

well done dear brother best regards @CiscoRamon