OP 22 June, 2023 - 12:55 PM
Scammers Profile Link: https://cracked.io/SurinX
Sales Thread: https://cracked.io/Thread-%E2%9C%85-4x-K...y%E2%AD%90 ALSO https://cracked.io/Thread-Supreme-%E2%9A...-%E2%9C%85
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: /
Screenshots of Communication: /
Additional Information: About a week ago, i got a notification on discord by my good friend @similitude, about a user named SurinX rep fucking him, so i join the shoutbox and see that he's a random dev, who apparently uses a public email bombing source and does weird marketing moves publicly such as :
-Giving out free keys to HIS OWN service in the category "Other Leaks" as proven in the thread above.
-Giving out free keys to HIS OWN service in the shoutbox.
Later on, @eariel went and tried this self claimed "dev" email bombing service, 3 times in a row, no results, doesn't work.
We laugh about it for a while, and i personally claimed as a joke at FIRST, later on seriously "I bet your host is shit it doesn't even handle a small hit".
Which triggered said "dev", claiming his Host was "unhittable" and impossible to DDoS, which is clearly also a marketing argument, to reassure clients that the bot won't have downtime due to outside causes.
I replied to this claim by asking evidences, and later on asked if he could let me hit it with about 250gbps (udp if udp protocol, or about 50gbps if tcp via ack/syn), all custom bypasses to really challenge his host and claim that "unhittable" title.
Obviously asking the owner directly due to the rule of cracked claiming users aren't allowed to harm other users service, which i asked consent and his reply was no, which i respect, i was only asking & wont take actions if the owner doesnt give clear consent.
His reply were always full of anger, hate , which is a suspicious behavior, if you have marketing arguments and feel anger against a user asking for proof, and a test of a host security is suspicious IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
My demands are simple.
I demand a verification of his source by Moderators of cracked.io, because its most likely public claimed by a lot of users.
I demand a verification of his claim about his host being unhittable and i can take the responsibility of that attack with consent from the owner
I demand a verification of his service actually working, since @eariel did 3 test and all of them failed miserably.
If he's unable to prove all those, rules should be applied.
Crypto address for a refund: None, willing to warn / ban user.
Dont hesitate to ping me to clarify things said above.
-Rainbow
Sales Thread: https://cracked.io/Thread-%E2%9C%85-4x-K...y%E2%AD%90 ALSO https://cracked.io/Thread-Supreme-%E2%9A...-%E2%9C%85
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: /
Screenshots of Communication: /
Additional Information: About a week ago, i got a notification on discord by my good friend @similitude, about a user named SurinX rep fucking him, so i join the shoutbox and see that he's a random dev, who apparently uses a public email bombing source and does weird marketing moves publicly such as :
-Giving out free keys to HIS OWN service in the category "Other Leaks" as proven in the thread above.
-Giving out free keys to HIS OWN service in the shoutbox.
Later on, @eariel went and tried this self claimed "dev" email bombing service, 3 times in a row, no results, doesn't work.
We laugh about it for a while, and i personally claimed as a joke at FIRST, later on seriously "I bet your host is shit it doesn't even handle a small hit".
Which triggered said "dev", claiming his Host was "unhittable" and impossible to DDoS, which is clearly also a marketing argument, to reassure clients that the bot won't have downtime due to outside causes.
I replied to this claim by asking evidences, and later on asked if he could let me hit it with about 250gbps (udp if udp protocol, or about 50gbps if tcp via ack/syn), all custom bypasses to really challenge his host and claim that "unhittable" title.
Obviously asking the owner directly due to the rule of cracked claiming users aren't allowed to harm other users service, which i asked consent and his reply was no, which i respect, i was only asking & wont take actions if the owner doesnt give clear consent.
His reply were always full of anger, hate , which is a suspicious behavior, if you have marketing arguments and feel anger against a user asking for proof, and a test of a host security is suspicious IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
My demands are simple.
I demand a verification of his source by Moderators of cracked.io, because its most likely public claimed by a lot of users.
I demand a verification of his claim about his host being unhittable and i can take the responsibility of that attack with consent from the owner
I demand a verification of his service actually working, since @eariel did 3 test and all of them failed miserably.
If he's unable to prove all those, rules should be applied.
Crypto address for a refund: None, willing to warn / ban user.
Dont hesitate to ping me to clarify things said above.
-Rainbow
Surveillance's Public PGP Key
![[Image: pKERrrM.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/pKERrrM.gif)
![[Image: goodeats-sig-2.gif]](https://i.ibb.co/w0Q2LRN/goodeats-sig-2.gif)
![[Image: kek.png]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.cracked.io%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fkek.png)
![[Image: clown2.gif]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.cracked.io%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fclown2.gif)
