Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!



 8443

Review of my Deal Dispute *please read*

by Alteon - 17 October, 2024 - 04:43 PM
This post is by a banned member (Pikr) - Unhide
Pikr  
Premium Member
129
Posts
39
Threads
5 Years of service
#25
I aint reading all this
This post is by a banned member (KSZ) - Unhide
KSZ  
Administrators
4.779
Posts
54
Threads
Staff Team
6 Years of service
#26
(24 October, 2024 - 09:48 PM)Alteon Wrote: Show More
(23 October, 2024 - 09:50 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
(17 October, 2024 - 04:43 PM)Alteon Wrote: Show More
Hello, Im making this thread because im unsatisfied and upset about the outcome of my scam report. I will list all the reason&evidence here so hopefully other staff member can review it.

Alright, so user "TheFry" told me about proxies that are working with SLC Checker (league of legends checker) he told me about @BlackDevilProxy (i will name him BD in this thread) and his service. On 9/22/2024 i paid 140$ for a monthly proxy package. (TXID)

The tool requires captcha to be able to run. But BD claims that he has captcha built into the pool so the checker doesnt need anything else except the proxies to run smoothly. It took around 24 hours after i paid him to get my proxies delivered and i immediately went to test the proxies. After about 30 minutes of setting everything up and testing I told him they dont work, for evidence click HERE

BD "tried" to help me but gave up soon after saying its problem on "my end". Keep in mind that i bought RDP that he said is "perfect" as you can see HERE. So if RDP and Checker are working the only problem that is left are his proxies.
Even tho he claimed that if there is any problem he will solve it within 24 hours which you can see HERE. He refused to help me with my problem&refused to refund me and blocked me afterwards..Because im blocked i couldnt contact him and tell him to bind my new rdp ip to the proxies. so basically i now dont even have access to the proxies i bought.

Now lets get to the deal dispute. I Believe @Darkness made a wrong decision. But first of all i want to talk about him. The scam report was opened for about 20 days during that time Darkness kept ignoring me and didnt want to answer to single message i sent him on Forum/discord/telegram. PROOF HERE Please keep this in mind.  He also deleted the comment where he requested that BD refunds me within 24 hours when BD got defensive and declined to refund. PROOF HERE.

And finally after 20 days he came to the conclusion that there is no need for a refund because: "I used the proxies consistently" - from the first day the package didnt work so i didnt even check 1 single account using his proxies.
"The issue was likely due to the SLC checker" - The checker worked whole time. even BD confirmed that so its clear he didnt read anything.
"He has provided proof of the tool working as supposed to with the proxies in question" - This part confuses me the most, So he sent a video proving his proxies work for him and that automatically means it works for  me as well?

Keep in mind that Darkness came to this conclusion without replying to a single message i sent him, without asking me if proxies work now, without asking me if i used the proxies. And clearly he didnt even read the messages&evidence that i sent him. And he just closed the deal dispute without any communication with me.

Regarding the ignore part, staff are not responsible for replying on platforms other than forum pm, did you send him a forum pm asking for updates, which he ignored? If yes, please provide the evidence.
Generally speaking, proxy services are not responsible for refunding you if the proxies don't work on a specific target (but works overall), unless you have been in touch with them before purchase and discussed the use case, and got their approval/confirmation/commitment.  Please provide evidence where you asked them that it would work.
Then we will proceed with this review.
You are requested to pm me once you have made a response because this isn't made in the correct section and won't be monitored.

Yes, i sent him forum pm which he ignored. you can see here (https://imgur.com/a/rxzMCHN) And i understand that proxy services are generally not responsible. But the proxies in this case are specifically built for this checker. This was discussed before purchase. I will pm you the proof.

This is a single forum pm as opposed to several pms sent on telegram, and since we get several PMs a day, it's natural to sometimes miss a pm as the list only shows 20 pms, and then you have to scroll to other pages.  I wont count this as "ignoring you". All evidence must be posted here just like you are posting other screenshots for sake of transparency unless it contains personal information.
I can see that he mentioned that it would work on SLC checker, now i searched for it and could find several version on different websites, i need to know the version you have works with other proxies, please provide the evidence of the checker working so we can rule out that the checker is the issue.
For account recoveries and 2fa issues, contact @Liars or @Darkness
For any upgrade-related issues, please private message me on-site.


Alert: Replies may take up to 48 hours.

[Image: I4kF791.gif]

Important note: Do not private message me for IntenseProxy support, instead send an email to [email protected]
 

 
This post is by a banned member (BlackDevilProxy) - Unhide
170
Posts
1
Threads
2 Years of service
#27
(25 October, 2024 - 10:58 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
(24 October, 2024 - 09:48 PM)Alteon Wrote: Show More
(23 October, 2024 - 09:50 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
Regarding the ignore part, staff are not responsible for replying on platforms other than forum pm, did you send him a forum pm asking for updates, which he ignored? If yes, please provide the evidence.
Generally speaking, proxy services are not responsible for refunding you if the proxies don't work on a specific target (but works overall), unless you have been in touch with them before purchase and discussed the use case, and got their approval/confirmation/commitment.  Please provide evidence where you asked them that it would work.
Then we will proceed with this review.
You are requested to pm me once you have made a response because this isn't made in the correct section and won't be monitored.

Yes, i sent him forum pm which he ignored. you can see here (https://imgur.com/a/rxzMCHN) And i understand that proxy services are generally not responsible. But the proxies in this case are specifically built for this checker. This was discussed before purchase. I will pm you the proof.

This is a single forum pm as opposed to several pms sent on telegram, and since we get several PMs a day, it's natural to sometimes miss a pm as the list only shows 20 pms, and then you have to scroll to other pages.  I wont count this as "ignoring you". All evidence must be posted here just like you are posting other screenshots for sake of transparency unless it contains personal information.
I can see that he mentioned that it would work on SLC checker, now i searched for it and could find several version on different websites, i need to know the version you have works with other proxies, please provide the evidence of the checker working so we can rule out that the checker is the issue.
the client's package has expired (the date of purchase has passed, so I am informing you from myself) and this is the last update from my side on this topic, everything was explained to Darkness and all the evidence that was required as well as those that he did not ask for were presented, we are not a walking person an encyclopedia and a tutorial for 3 people, we are not obliged to return the funds when the proxies are working properly at a given moment and the 3rd person (buyer) cannot use them, the package has been violated many times (we also sent evidence of this)

the buyer's package worked properly from the date of purchase to the date of expiry and he had access to it throughout this period, I will also mention this.

We also provided all the information that everything worked as it should, the topic is closed for me

Last words, I would like to thank you for your professional approach to the matter and its resolution by Darkness.
This post is by a banned member (KSZ) - Unhide
KSZ  
Administrators
4.779
Posts
54
Threads
Staff Team
6 Years of service
#28
(25 October, 2024 - 10:58 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
(24 October, 2024 - 09:48 PM)Alteon Wrote: Show More
(23 October, 2024 - 09:50 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
Regarding the ignore part, staff are not responsible for replying on platforms other than forum pm, did you send him a forum pm asking for updates, which he ignored? If yes, please provide the evidence.
Generally speaking, proxy services are not responsible for refunding you if the proxies don't work on a specific target (but works overall), unless you have been in touch with them before purchase and discussed the use case, and got their approval/confirmation/commitment.  Please provide evidence where you asked them that it would work.
Then we will proceed with this review.
You are requested to pm me once you have made a response because this isn't made in the correct section and won't be monitored.

Yes, i sent him forum pm which he ignored. you can see here (https://imgur.com/a/rxzMCHN) And i understand that proxy services are generally not responsible. But the proxies in this case are specifically built for this checker. This was discussed before purchase. I will pm you the proof.

This is a single forum pm as opposed to several pms sent on telegram, and since we get several PMs a day, it's natural to sometimes miss a pm as the list only shows 20 pms, and then you have to scroll to other pages.  I wont count this as "ignoring you". All evidence must be posted here just like you are posting other screenshots for sake of transparency unless it contains personal information.
I can see that he mentioned that it would work on SLC checker, now i searched for it and could find several version on different websites, i need to know the version you have works with other proxies, please provide the evidence of the checker working so we can rule out that the checker is the issue.

@Alteon respond within 48 hours please otherwise review will be closed.
For account recoveries and 2fa issues, contact @Liars or @Darkness
For any upgrade-related issues, please private message me on-site.


Alert: Replies may take up to 48 hours.

[Image: I4kF791.gif]

Important note: Do not private message me for IntenseProxy support, instead send an email to [email protected]
 

 
This post is by a banned member (Alteon) - Unhide
Alteon  
Infinity
176
Posts
47
Threads
4 Years of service
#29
(28 October, 2024 - 05:12 PM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
(25 October, 2024 - 10:58 AM)KSZ Wrote: Show More
(24 October, 2024 - 09:48 PM)Alteon Wrote: Show More
Yes, i sent him forum pm which he ignored. you can see here (https://imgur.com/a/rxzMCHN) And i understand that proxy services are generally not responsible. But the proxies in this case are specifically built for this checker. This was discussed before purchase. I will pm you the proof.

This is a single forum pm as opposed to several pms sent on telegram, and since we get several PMs a day, it's natural to sometimes miss a pm as the list only shows 20 pms, and then you have to scroll to other pages.  I wont count this as "ignoring you". All evidence must be posted here just like you are posting other screenshots for sake of transparency unless it contains personal information.
I can see that he mentioned that it would work on SLC checker, now i searched for it and could find several version on different websites, i need to know the version you have works with other proxies, please provide the evidence of the checker working so we can rule out that the checker is the issue.

@Alteon respond within 48 hours please otherwise review will be closed.

I sent you evidence including our whole chat to your pms
This post is by a banned member (KSZ) - Unhide
KSZ  
Administrators
4.779
Posts
54
Threads
Staff Team
6 Years of service
#30
@BlackDevilProxy Since you claimed the proxies worked on his specific target/checker, you are responsible for answering why it did not work for him. He has provided evidence that the checker works: https://streamable.com/842ydg. Based on my limited knowledge of the topic, proxies are the only issue left. Explain and upload proof that your proxies work on the said checker, the evidence must be a gif like the one uploaded by the OP.
For account recoveries and 2fa issues, contact @Liars or @Darkness
For any upgrade-related issues, please private message me on-site.


Alert: Replies may take up to 48 hours.

[Image: I4kF791.gif]

Important note: Do not private message me for IntenseProxy support, instead send an email to [email protected]
 

 
This post is by a banned member (Supreme) - Unhide
Supreme  
Supreme
1.720
Posts
142
Threads
1 Year of service
#31
(This post was last modified: 02 November, 2024 - 11:27 AM by Supreme. Edited 1 time in total.)
=======
This post is by a banned member (Cash) - Unhide
Cash  
Supreme
927
Posts
60
Threads
1 Year of service
#32
Personally I have dealt with deal disputes against me and from my side, 99% of the time all is fair not gonna lie, if you provide enough information for the admins nothing will go wrong, lack of information / screenshots or anything that could help you in your dispute doesn't mean the admins aren't doing their job or whatever.
I personally noticed a small thing, this forum needs more admins that are able to deal with disputes, everyday more disputes come to the forum with only 3 admins trying to solve them ( liars and darkness and ksz )
So maybe hiring more mods to take care of disputes would be better for the forum overall!
[Image: Comp-1-4.gif]

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 30 Guest(s)