SCAM REPORT @lepo1312

[302]

Hey @Liars , 
Kind reminder.

[2.603]

@Walterwhite90 @lepo1312

From the evidence proposed, the OP had endeavored to contact the indicted party and organize follow-up rendezvous with them. The accused responded to these attempts by articulating that they would continue to furnish these services. After that, the accused would defer the services when contended on their behalf. The OP made numerous attempts at communication, which were spurned and avoided by the indicted party.

The indicted party declared to the OP that the tutoring would continue and ensured the OP that the service would resume once both partakers were unrestricted and available. The accused party has been observed assuring the OP they would pick up where they had left off initially. Following this memorandum, the OP made several endeavors to arrange this affair, which would conclude in the confrontation of persisted repudiation from the indicted party.

If the indicted can show that they have reached out to the OP to establish a period for the continuance of the service purchased from them - prior to the innovation of this deal dispute; the indicted can do so in their follow-up riposte within 24 hours.

There is a documented succession of occurrences following a continuance agreement, in which the accused party vamoosed and became unresponsive without first disclosing their agendas or discretion's concerning the interest of responding to the OP. After a duration, the charged partaker would riposte to the op enunciating their rejection to deliver continuance of the agreed-upon service.

Understanding that all of the above is accurate and ratified without the indicted partaker opposing the voracious city of the declarations described above, the indicted will be seen as acquiescing and the forenamed utterances as incontrovertible, henceforth abdicating the decisive judgment in favor of the op.

The indicted partaker may remunerate the Op through any of the subsequent settlements.

• Propose a riposte in which the concatenated evidence mirrors the indicted party's endeavors to intercommunicate/assemble appointments with the OP to conduct the service they bought from the indicted party.
  
• The indicted party can opt to mentor the OP. Based on discussion with the indicted, the OP will determine a period and specify when he will provide the chartered service.
  
• Grant a partial reimbursement of fifty percent (50.00%) of the complete payment in endorsement of the op.
  

@lepo1312 Reply within 24 hours

[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]

[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[302]

[font]hi , i will refund the 50% [/font]

[133]

hi , i will refund the 50% 

LTC: LiUR7hvcVaN8i9TtDW3NEfBheTLWMQCUkn

[302]

i refunded 


proof : https://prnt.sc/3q3kQhnHb47o

proof 2 : https://prnt.sc/dUIzvwjZlEqu

proof 3 : https://prnt.sc/aq8_06migyIL


@Liars 
@Walterwhite90

[133]

check pms please 
@Liars
@Ping

[2.603]

i refunded 


proof : https://prnt.sc/3q3kQhnHb47o

proof 2 : https://prnt.sc/dUIzvwjZlEqu

proof 3 : https://prnt.sc/aq8_06migyIL


@Liars 
@Walterwhite90

You refunded an impersonator.
You have 24 hours to issue the payment to the op's correct address listed in this thread.

Refuse all communication outside of the forum that is from individuals claiming to be the op.

[DM to purchase Signature Ad Slots]

[Ping's PGP Key]
I am NOT affiliated with any "Ping" shops, or services being marketed over this forum.
Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[302]

WHAT LMAO WHAT , REFUNDED THE RIGHT PERSON , fuck this shit

i refunded on the thread's ltc addy , dont tell me any crazy shit now @Liars , @Walterwhite90

https://prnt.sc/njW9GMiGK1KU