OP 30 April, 2022 - 02:14 PM
(30 April, 2022 - 02:06 PM)Dan Wrote: Show MoreThat's a false claim, the standard payout in my server is not 70% and above. I'm really curious how this worker got this information when the worker doesn't know what are the deals I made with other staff this only proves how much of a lying and desperate person the worker is.
When I stopped providing logs I offered the worker 65% as shown in the screenshot he provided and he agreed to it and the website was not the reason he agreed to do 65%. He agreed to do 65% because he was greedy and wanted to work in my server so bad as my server was getting a very good amount of customers daily.
Once again as a last remark when I stopped providing logs the worker had to choose between 65% or nothing as that was the highest I offered him and he could've refused but the worker agreed and proceeded the services regarding the chipotle orders till the moment the worker got caught exploiting and abusing hence that fired.
@MemePC can confirm this as he was offered the same exact deal since the beginning
He was offered 35% and I provided the logs then we switched to 65% and he was getting his own logs and he agreed and he was pleased with it and so the worker in this instance.
Then @MemePC wanted to renogioate an increment of 5% and I agreed to that same happend with the the worker in this instance turninrg the final payount per order to a 70% total.
The worker procedeed to do 70% for manual orders and never chose the 65% deal for the ones with the website, page that never been opened and if the worker still strongly sustains that the website was the reason he agreed to it then it must be proven as such becauce such deal never been taken in consideration by the worker himself droping his statements once again
The only reason the worker agreed to the deal proposed was because that's the highest he was offered at that time and the 70% deal per order after the rise was the final payout and nothing more.
Stating that I owe 5% on all the past orders after the increment is toatly absurd and outta common sense, it's higly false and there is no evindece or proof as such as the first proposed deal was 65% per order and afterwards a rise of 5% was applied coming up to 70% total payout per order, deals to which I can bring withness to support my affirmations.
If the worker is asking for compensation from an old deal to all the past orders after the payout rise then this is complete none sense delirious claim showing how desperate the worker is to get free money out of an invalid report.
The worker is basically a joke in this state of topic , basically asking 5% for all the past orders after the rise, like you have a job at mcdonaldas and you get a bigger salary and then you ask your boss to give you the money rised from all the past services as well, like do you even hear yourself.
Then in this instance I have every right to ask for a compensation myself, for every order that the worker wasn't able to sell causing , time loss , money loss and the customer to close the ticket and for trying to ruining a $450 deal I had with one of my member workers.
Please can you provide any evidence to support any of your claims? All I see, is you and your slave MemePC who will do anything you say. @Ping you cant get his statements in consideration without evidence. There are evidence and counter-evidence proving his statements wrong all over the thread. If he desnt provide proof or takes screenshots out of context like he keeps doing, I'd rather wait for Liars.
@memepc you owe me 2$ as I let you keep it for your log. Since you ruined things for me, I'd like to have it back as you never were grateful for the opportunities I gave you.
bc1qg9qmkxgd4488k694xsahw3yd9r2a85fpccavrq
