Supreme DWC for new members

[1.898]

blame the people who trust the 1-2 month members with 200 rep. Always use a middleman. Don't be incompetent. If something is too good to be true it is. 

Simple rules to go by.

i agree but a dwc will make them more cautious

There have been many cases, where the fact that the scammer had a dwc on him didn't stop victims with dealing with him. At this point it's survival of the fittest. If you get scammed while someone has DWC then maybe they need to learn a lesson. And learn from their own mistakes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1.176]

blame the people who trust the 1-2 month members with 200 rep. Always use a middleman. Don't be incompetent. If something is too good to be true it is. 

Simple rules to go by.

i agree but a dwc will make them more cautious

There have been many cases, where the fact that the scammer had a dwc on him didn't stop victims with dealing with him. At this point it's survival of the fittest. If you get scammed while someone has DWC then maybe they need to learn a lesson. And learn from their own mistakes.

again, what’s the harm of putting more caution on their profile? what if they don’t have a dwc but look dodgy as fuck

 

[1.898]

i agree but a dwc will make them more cautious

There have been many cases, where the fact that the scammer had a dwc on him didn't stop victims with dealing with him. At this point it's survival of the fittest. If you get scammed while someone has DWC then maybe they need to learn a lesson. And learn from their own mistakes.

again, what’s the harm of putting more caution on their profile? what if they don’t have a dwc but look dodgy as fuck

again, what’s the harm of putting more caution on their profile? If this isn't enough caution then I don't know what is 
what if they don’t have a dwc but look dodgy as fuck - There's a good old saying, if something is too good to be true it probably is. Also if people can't use common sense. And can't just use a middleman when in doubt. Well as I said survival of the fittest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[4.620]

I think a badge saying that they're new would be better otherwise, the DWC thing would be seen too often making it seem less important

( NEW DOMAIN: LEAKED.TOOLS )
----------------------------------------

cracked.io/Thread-UserScript-Draft-Tools-v2-Adds-Features-to-Creating-Threads

[3.933]

All members registered in 1-2 months should have a dwc, or all members registered in 1-2 months who have created a marketplace thread.

This will make people more cautious about sellers and will stop sellers with 200 rep but joined last week from exiting.

This may be unfair on new members who are legit, but exit scamming is a real problem and i’m sure they would rather have a dwc than see half the forum being scammed.

@KSZ

Good idea. Legit members, who're new. DWC or must-buy group on the forum. Then work for little time. It's fine for legit guys. We spent 4 years on that and began with 5$ projects. And it's fair to rule for anyone who wants to build a legit service or shop, whatever. Work on your reputation, and invite trusted members as your customers. Many guys from here do it with pleasure to test the new man. Or buy a design from @HeavensPro (joking, not).

Anyway – scamming it's a big big problem now, community should advise more things about it, because I feel like the marketplace rules must go harder.

Fair Market - it's not the right, it's the privilege. And we should protect this privilege, by sorting the scammers from legit guys.

Crafting elite quality Design, Websites & IT products for business.
Make people talk about your brand, with @HeavensPro


 
Subscribe on our Telegram & watch the portfolio heavens.pro

[9]

[32]

bump