OP 05 September, 2024 - 08:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 12 January, 2025 - 08:54 PM by kneel. Edited 3 times in total.)
Lately, I’ve noticed a growing number of scammers in the eBook section, as well as some questionable VC reviews. Because of this, I figured I’d bring up an idea I saw in a thread a while ago (shoutout to the original poster, though I can’t recall your username).
Essentially, the suggestion is to form a volunteer review team that examines newly published products—whether they’re eBooks, services, mentorships, or anything else. This team would be composed of trusted members who specialize in reviewing different offerings. Once they verify that a product is legitimate and meets quality standards, it would be approved and posted in the relevant section.
To join the review team, members would need to have a solid reputation, demonstrate trustworthiness, and show an active presence in the community. They should be willing to work together to create a safer marketplace for everyone here, which includes providing documented proof of a product’s functionality and offering an honest, unbiased personal review.
Of course, there might be instances where a product doesn’t work at the exact time of review, or a seller can’t provide a VC due to high demand. In these cases, it would be logical to allow exceptions and let the team evaluate whatever other evidence the seller can provide.
I’m aware this idea might have some gaps, so feel free to share your thoughts or any improvements you think would help!
Essentially, the suggestion is to form a volunteer review team that examines newly published products—whether they’re eBooks, services, mentorships, or anything else. This team would be composed of trusted members who specialize in reviewing different offerings. Once they verify that a product is legitimate and meets quality standards, it would be approved and posted in the relevant section.
To join the review team, members would need to have a solid reputation, demonstrate trustworthiness, and show an active presence in the community. They should be willing to work together to create a safer marketplace for everyone here, which includes providing documented proof of a product’s functionality and offering an honest, unbiased personal review.
Of course, there might be instances where a product doesn’t work at the exact time of review, or a seller can’t provide a VC due to high demand. In these cases, it would be logical to allow exceptions and let the team evaluate whatever other evidence the seller can provide.
I’m aware this idea might have some gaps, so feel free to share your thoughts or any improvements you think would help!
