VEGA CODING AKA RUSTICUS ON TELEGRAM 290 $

[224]

Scammers Profile Link: https://cracked.io/VEGA
Sales Thread: website
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: 1
Screenshots of Communication:
The deal:

Here I wasnt sure if it gonna work since I didnt tested it:

Here again, and he sayed he gonna try for sure to fix it.

After I while I tested myself the original code if it works and it worked.

Here is making excuses to dont test his own fucking code on a VM, wtf. You are sending me a code that u even dont know if it works:? lol

Here again, same shit, to test it bymyself:


Here are some proof that the stealer actually works and is not a random shit how this dude mention it.


And the original coder telegram since their github got banned:


Additional Information:
So basically I contacted this dude help me with changing the code of a stealer where the function of the malware was sending the data to a telegram, but I wanted to change how the stealer sends the data stealed, to a a web server(a simple python server to recive de data on .txt files)
The problem comes when this dude sends me the files and are not working, the new stealer with the new code doesnt works, I am not getting any data on the server, and THIS DUDE DIDNT EVEN CHECKED HIS OWN CODE ON A VM TO SEE IF IT WORKS OR NOT AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREENSHOOTS. At the first point of the conversation I wasnt sure if the stealer was working since I couldnt test it because I didnt have setup payed, but after a while I could test it to check if the orignal code was working and yes it did.

Crypto address for a refund: pm

[1]

System bot message: @VEGA (VEGA) has been notified about this dispute via private messages and has 24hours to reply in this thread

top [exp 15/01/24]

 

Taking care of cracked.io's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[950]

Hello Dispute Moderator,

1. The client asked me to modify a stealer so that data would be routed to a web server instead of Telegram. I completed exactly that request by changing function names (as instructed) and adjusting the code to point to a Python server. I delivered these modified files promptly.
   
2. The client provided the original software from a random website. That software had problems before I ever touched it. I am not responsible if the source code itself was faulty or if the stealer never worked properly in the first place. The client themselves acknowledged issues with the original code.
   
3. The client claims the modified software “doesn’t work,” but provided no verifiable proof of testing or logs showing errors from the Python server. Moreover, the code was never tested in a proper environment (like a VM) by the client initially, and it seems they only tested halfway or in an environment that might not be reliable.
   
4. My Terms of Service explicitly state that refunds will not be provided once the work is delivered—especially after I’ve invested time modifying the code. I fulfilled my end of the deal by delivering the requested modifications. The client even initially confirmed I did what was asked.
   This is also the second deal we’ve done together, and my reputation is well-established. I have no incentive to scam, and there is no reason for me to provide non-working modifications when my own reputation is at stake.
   
5. The client appears to want to resell or distribute this stealer on a public forum. That raises ethical concerns, which I clearly did not endorse. I advised them it was risky. Any negative results stemming from the software’s illegal use is not my responsibility.
   

Given all the above, I delivered on my commitments:

• Changed function names.
  
• Altered the code to send data to a server.
  

Conclusion:

• The code was delivered as promised.
  
• My TOS state no refunds once the project is complete.
  
• The client’s own software was problematic from the start, which is outside my control.
  
• I have performed exactly what was requested, so the dispute is unwarranted.
  

I appreciate your time reviewing this, and I remain open to answering any further questions about my completed work.

[224]

HERE IS THE PROOF THE CODE NOT WORKING A SHIT.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/6pz7vhb4u...f.mp4/file
At the first point I thought it wasnt working becuase it had the anti vm, but even with the anti vm runned this shit that he sent me doest works.
Also this dude is trying to code a script when he doesnt even know how this work, how dumb you can be?

[11.963]

@VEGA Did you test the code before sending it to the buyer?

CLAIM 50% OFF | Discord: salesgodno1 | Telegram: salesgodgfx

[TOP SPOT] Ad by @SalesGod - Until 29.12
SPOT AVAILABLE
[MIDDLE SPOT] Ad by YOU
SPOT AVAILABLE
[BOTTOM SPOT] Ad by YOU
Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with any of the ads shown above. They're paid advertisements. Please make sure to confirm via PM before contacting me. I do not sell, buy or exchange anything. Be careful of impersonators & scammers.

[224]

@VEGA Did you test the code before sending it to the buyer?

He never did that as you can see on the fifth and sixth image.

[950]

Hey Mod, let me break down what’s really going on here:

1. This guy grabbed some random stealer code from who-knows-where (a Telegram channel, apparently) and never actually confirmed if it worked in the first place. He literally admitted he didn’t know if it was functional or not.
   
2. I was only hired to do two things:
   • Reroute the data from Telegram to a Python server.
     
   • Rename some functions so it looks different.
     That’s it. No full QA, no guaranteeing the entire stealer works, no debugging someone else’s broken code.
     
3. The portion I coded (server route) did get tested with some basic test cases. I verified the data submission logic was correct on my end. But the bigger problem is that the software the client gave me is broken at its core. If your original code doesn’t even run or has anti-VM or other issues, that’s outside the scope of my job.
   
4. At one point, the client insisted it wasn’t working because of anti-VM. We removed or ignored the anti-VM logic, but guess what? The code is still trash. So this proves the real problem is with his downloaded stealer code, not my reroute modifications.
   
5. This client doesn’t really understand coding and he himself told me that. He’s basically trying to jump into some shady “resell a stealer” hustle. Now he’s blaming me for the fact that the code is busted. All I did was what I was asked: “Change function names + point data to a server.” 
   
6. Blaming Me After the Fact
   • He never tested it properly before hiring me.
     
   • He never confirmed the original code even worked.
     
   • Now that it’s still not working, he wants a refund, claiming “I didn’t test everything.”
     But testing the entire stolen code for full functionality wasn’t my job. The client never paid me to fix and debug every line of code in his random stealer.
     - he is basically flipping the old conversation messages and new conversation messages and wanted to prove something from screenshots but they are the conversation we had at different point of time in different scenarios.
     
7. I did exactly what we agreed on: changed some function names, rerouted to a server, and tested that portion. If the entire software fails beyond that, it’s because the original code was never good to begin with. I’m not obligated to fix or rewrite a broken stealer from scratch for free. That’s a separate job (which, frankly, I’d rather not do, given it’s a shady tool to begin with).
   

So, I delivered exactly what was in the deal. The client’s software is failing because it was always a mess. Not my fault, not my responsibility. He wants to blame me for the bigger picture of “the software doesn’t run,” but that’s on him—and that’s exactly why we specifically limited my job to rerouting data, not guaranteeing the entire codebase was top-notch.
I hope this clears up any confusion. Let me know if you need more details.

---

Here is the deal we agreed
https://imgur.com/a/K4xezVa

[224]

"He never confirmed the original code even worked. "This dude is a fucking lier tested as I sayed it on the following conversation to CHECK IF THE ORIGINAL CODE WAS WORKING AND YES IT DID.


@Darkness I also had a conversation right now with the original coder telling that the main code works.
I can send you the proof on private for that, also the main source of it. Since is not a "random code"

---

And how could this dude do this?
My request was to change how the data is sent, instead of telegram, to a web server.
To do that you have to check where the data stealed is stored first by the original code, split the data in to txt files and sends requests to the web server.
How the fuck you would know to do this without even testing the main script, only with a "debug" tool. Are you fucking kidding me?
You made a fucking function names modification + the way on how the data is sent WITHOUT EVEN KNOW HOW THE CODE WORKS? LOL