11 July, 2020 - 08:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 11 July, 2020 - 09:03 AM by CYBER0.
Edit Reason: adding on things
)
(11 July, 2020 - 08:05 AM)TheWhiteboardAlts Wrote: Show MoreWait so in this last part. You've stated clearly that they are public correct? Next "index.php" is not a method. It's a page in every php web server. It's the base page. WHICH IN YOUR EBOOK, you did not know the difference between a page of javascript and the method that you "allegedly" found. Now if you found it, you would CLEARLY understand it's methodology. Not making such major mistakes which I made sure Cyber had capitalized for me. You did not explain something well when you don't understand how it works. Again on the numeric. It's completely incorrect syntax. You don't put a keyword (numeric code) as a parameter, because it fucks with google. Just because you add a number (which people have been doing for years ever so clearly) and putting it in an incorrect syntax doesn't make it a "method". You said I didn't confront you about the public methods. Which I clearly did provide evidence I had brought it up. I also provided another screenshot to Darkness which includes you describing the methods as private as of which I believe was the 8th of January. NOW you're stating it's public for several years right here? Please make a conscious decision of it's worth before advertising it as private to not be once we open the book. Another thing. If your other customers can't compare your book to anything. How are they to know you're using incorrect syntax throughout almost every method in your book? It's not like we read minds. If a new Hz gets released for a TV. The old one looks jittery. So I made a complete explanation of errors throughout your entire book explaining each syntax and logical error. This also shows sites where the logic for your methods could primarily be based off. And the reason I say that is you can't find a method and not know how it works. Not only is that inconceivably entertaining it also shows that you've stolen public methods as linked multiple times in this thread and added some other functions which google encourage to be used and multiple hundreds of "Google Hacking Ebooks" provide. If you'd like to talk about combining strings and queries being a private method let's discuss coding like ZeroNT and Cyber wanted to. Just because you put 2 functions or variables to overlap in coding doesn't mean you've found a "private" piece of code. It means you've put to together to achieve a desired outcome. I'm sure you think index was described perfectly but if you look back on your first chapter. YOU SHOW JAVASCRIPT "indexOf" and claim this is the original of the index.php method. Which is just completely wrong. You follow this up with multiple syntax errors rendering the method just a joke.
You also said you have people on news articles your methods to post. Should we contact those journalists that you allegedly shared it to when I confronted you about the methods being posted on google? If they found it? And didn't get from you. Just between you and me. It can't be that private
But is it public?
To whom it may concern,
Lucas has responded on the scam report that, laughably, Whiteboard created on both forums. Lucas has reviewed the ebook and come up with this statement after receiving a test.
(11 July, 2020 - 08:05 AM)TheWhiteboardAlts Wrote: Show MoreLucas already posted a statement which he got to see the ebook for himself. He already made a judgement.Wait so in this last part. You've stated clearly that they are public correct? Next "index.php" is not a method. It's a page in every php web server. It's the base page. WHICH IN YOUR EBOOK, you did not know the difference between a page of javascript and the method that you "allegedly" found. Now if you found it, you would CLEARLY understand it's methodology. Not making such major mistakes which I made sure Cyber had capitalized for me. You did not explain something well when you don't understand how it works. Again on the numeric. It's completely incorrect syntax. You don't put a keyword (numeric code) as a parameter, because it fucks with google. Just because you add a number (which people have been doing for years ever so clearly) and putting it in an incorrect syntax doesn't make it a "method". You said I didn't confront you about the public methods. Which I clearly did provide evidence I had brought it up. I also provided another screenshot to Darkness which includes you describing the methods as private as of which I believe was the 8th of January. NOW you're stating it's public for several years right here? Please make a conscious decision of it's worth before advertising it as private to not be once we open the book. Another thing. If your other customers can't compare your book to anything. How are they to know you're using incorrect syntax throughout almost every method in your book? It's not like we read minds. If a new Hz gets released for a TV. The old one looks jittery. So I made a complete explanation of errors throughout your entire book explaining each syntax and logical error. This also shows sites where the logic for your methods could primarily be based off. And the reason I say that is you can't find a method and not know how it works. Not only is that inconceivably entertaining it also shows that you've stolen public methods as linked multiple times in this thread and added some other functions which google encourage to be used and multiple hundreds of "Google Hacking Ebooks" provide. If you'd like to talk about combining strings and queries being a private method let's discuss coding like ZeroNT and Cyber wanted to. Just because you put 2 functions or variables to overlap in coding doesn't mean you've found a "private" piece of code. It means you've put to together to achieve a desired outcome. I'm sure you think index was described perfectly but if you look back on your first chapter. YOU SHOW JAVASCRIPT "indexOf" and claim this is the original of the index.php method. Which is just completely wrong. You follow this up with multiple syntax errors rendering the method just a joke.
You also said you have people on news articles your methods to post. Should we contact those journalists that you allegedly shared it to when I confronted you about the methods being posted on google? If they found it? And didn't get from you. Just between you and me. It can't be that private
Also, DonJuji exposed you on Nulled.to
As if this wasn't enough, you also went on to shittalk about me and DonXirus with juji.
(crazyn1nja = thewhiteboardalts)
The funny part is, nobody but DonXirus has ever laid their eyes upon a crypted dork, for you to go around saying that it's stolen method tells a lot about you.