29 February, 2020 - 09:17 PM(This post was last modified: 29 February, 2020 - 09:19 PM by YuriZahard.)
Reply
(29 February, 2020 - 08:53 PM)Theodore Wrote: Show More
@Darkness @ararararagi I'll send u both screenies of crystal asking me to post the thread, I also didn't put it in my signature cause a) he didn't ask, b) I couldn't bother
Also, you seem like u trynna be a smart-ass and all by googling shit, listen to this; me not selling was never a term and wasn't even mentioned.
I don't give a rat's ass what was going on inside your head at the time, you agreed to the terms on the table while also failing to state your side (if that was even your true intention at the time)
I cannot call out each and everything that might make the deal void sir. For example, the method getting public would also void the agreement. What I'm telling is you literally started selling the SAME accounts on the SAME day so it is completely relevant. Crystal asking or not asking is of little consequence because you started selling the accounts . How can you expect me to pay you when you have also started selling the same accounts yourself. That too without even telling me. You can call me smart-ass or whatever, the logic what I'm implying is very "crystal" clear. You started selling which is a major and relevant thing to our agreement and failed to disclose this when I clearly asked you. Hence that deal was off the table.
This post is by a banned member (Theodore) - Unhide
(29 February, 2020 - 09:17 PM)Ararararagi Wrote: Show More
(29 February, 2020 - 08:53 PM)Theodore Wrote: Show More
@Darkness @ararararagi I'll send u both screenies of crystal asking me to post the thread, I also didn't put it in my signature cause a) he didn't ask, b) I couldn't bother
Also, you seem like u trynna be a smart-ass and all by googling shit, listen to this; me not selling was never a term and wasn't even mentioned.
I don't give a rat's ass what was going on inside your head at the time, you agreed to the terms on the table while also failing to state your side (if that was even your true intention at the time)
I cannot call out each and everything that might make the deal void sir. For example, the method getting public would also void the agreement. What I'm telling is you literally started selling the SAME accounts on the SAME day so it is completely relevant. Crystal asking or not asking is of little consequence because you started selling the accounts . How can you expect me to pay you when you have also started selling the same accounts yourself. That too without even telling me. You can call me smart-ass or whatever, the logic what I'm implying is very "crystal" clear. You started selling which is a major and relevant thing to our agreement and failed to disclose this when I clearly asked you. Hence that deal was off the table.
I made 0$ from that shop so I didn't sell em myself, the .edu email got public, the GitHub method did not, I did my research before this thread and searched for a good 20 mins across c.to and n.to to find my method but it's nowhere to be seen
This post is by a banned member (YuriZahard) - Unhide
(29 February, 2020 - 09:22 PM)Theodore Wrote: Show More
(29 February, 2020 - 09:17 PM)Ararararagi Wrote: Show More
(29 February, 2020 - 08:53 PM)Theodore Wrote: Show More
@Darkness @ararararagi I'll send u both screenies of crystal asking me to post the thread, I also didn't put it in my signature cause a) he didn't ask, b) I couldn't bother
Also, you seem like u trynna be a smart-ass and all by googling shit, listen to this; me not selling was never a term and wasn't even mentioned.
I don't give a rat's ass what was going on inside your head at the time, you agreed to the terms on the table while also failing to state your side (if that was even your true intention at the time)
I cannot call out each and everything that might make the deal void sir. For example, the method getting public would also void the agreement. What I'm telling is you literally started selling the SAME accounts on the SAME day so it is completely relevant. Crystal asking or not asking is of little consequence because you started selling the accounts . How can you expect me to pay you when you have also started selling the same accounts yourself. That too without even telling me. You can call me smart-ass or whatever, the logic what I'm implying is very "crystal" clear. You started selling which is a major and relevant thing to our agreement and failed to disclose this when I clearly asked you. Hence that deal was off the table.
I made 0$ from that shop so I didn't sell em myself, the .edu email got public, the GitHub method did not, I did my research before this thread and searched for a good 20 mins across c.to and n.to to find my method but it's nowhere to be seen
Method going public was an example of something that can void the agreement. What I'm implying is i cannot call each and everything that will make the contract void. I'm bringing an issue which is completely relevant to the agreement as well. You started selling the accounts. Period. If you'd have told me that when i asked you, I'd never offer any deal.
This post is by a banned member (Theodore) - Unhide
(29 February, 2020 - 09:28 PM)Ararararagi Wrote: Show More
(29 February, 2020 - 09:22 PM)Theodore Wrote: Show More
(29 February, 2020 - 09:17 PM)Ararararagi Wrote: Show More
I cannot call out each and everything that might make the deal void sir. For example, the method getting public would also void the agreement. What I'm telling is you literally started selling the SAME accounts on the SAME day so it is completely relevant. Crystal asking or not asking is of little consequence because you started selling the accounts . How can you expect me to pay you when you have also started selling the same accounts yourself. That too without even telling me. You can call me smart-ass or whatever, the logic what I'm implying is very "crystal" clear. You started selling which is a major and relevant thing to our agreement and failed to disclose this when I clearly asked you. Hence that deal was off the table.
I made 0$ from that shop so I didn't sell em myself, the .edu email got public, the GitHub method did not, I did my research before this thread and searched for a good 20 mins across c.to and n.to to find my method but it's nowhere to be seen
Method going public was an example of something that can void the agreement. What I'm implying is i cannot call each and everything that will make the contract void. I'm bringing an issue which is completely relevant to the agreement as well. You started selling the accounts. Period. If you'd have told me that when i asked you, I'd never offer any deal.
How was I supposed to know? If I remember correctly, u never said the contract was voided?
This post is by a banned member (YuriZahard) - Unhide
In the same lines how was i supposed to know you were goona sell? you never said you were gonna sell the method/sell accounts even when i specifically asked? And me deleting my thread can be seen as token that the contract was void.
This post is by a banned member (Theodore) - Unhide
OP29 February, 2020 - 09:45 PM(This post was last modified: 29 February, 2020 - 09:52 PM by Theodore.)
Reply
(29 February, 2020 - 09:43 PM)Ararararagi Wrote: Show More
In the same lines how was i supposed to know you were goona sell? you never said you were gonna sell the method/sell accounts even when i specifically asked? And me deleting my thread can be seen as token that the contract was void.
A) you deleted the thread after I made the scam report, so , at the time of the scam report, so that's just some new kind of bs
b) maybe it wasn't in my plans to sell when you asked? (Which I don't remember you asking)
@Darkness, we solved this out on discord, you can close now.
This post is by a banned member (Darkness) - Unhide