scam / dispute @BrettJS

[10]

Scammers Profile Link: https://cracked.io/BrettJS
Sales Thread:https://cracked.io/Thread-%E2%9A%A1%EF%B8%8F-%E2%96%91-BRETT-S-DDOS-FOR-HIRE-%E2%96%91-%E2%9A%A1%EF%B8%8F-CHEAPEST-ON-THE-MARKET-%E2%9A%A1%EF%B8%8F-FROM-50-DAY-%E2%9A%A1%EF%B8%8F-L4-L7
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: 200$ I want him to refund half ( 100$)
Screenshots of Communication: https://imgur.com/a/0IsxGJc
Additional Information:
Our agreement was 200$ for a month to get down a website 95% if the specs doesn’t change, in the 5 days it was like 50% down, and from 27th of April until 1st of May was down 95%.
I contacted him on the 1st and his response was “fixing today” - screenshot 1
On the 2nd he didn’t answer
3th of may - he said that the owner of the website changed the spec - screenshot 2
4th of may- didn’t respond 5th of may - he said that he didn’t work on it because he had a full “blackout” day And then until yesterday he didn’t contacted me or do anything about our agreement until I said that I want my money back, then after 1 hour the website was down for like 1-2 hours, then back up again.
He is saying that he is having exams but isn’t my problem. I gave him 9 days to get the work done, he just excuses himself. He was thinking that I will not say anything and the time passes.

Crypto address for a refund: 8476v5xr5Nu9AMMnxgf9NyT9nqDeHhbbPdfLYXGkTUqibWtdGVpu9St64riQVwW9YkGYgakBFiTh5UkuuJaCHWt9LXvVqWA - XMR

[1]

System bot message: @BrettJS (BrettJS) has been notified about this dispute via private messages and has 24hours to reply in this thread

top [exp 16/12/24]

 

Taking care of cracked.io's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[46]

So the things is a customer of mine ordered my ddos attack service for a month of holding a site (https://salonevenimente.ro/) for 200$. We agreed on the site would be down for 95% because there is some proxy pool changes and some about the attack. The agreement included that 95% guarantee was for the same site specifications (Protection level, hosting, WAF and more) because if the site's owner changes something about the site's protection, then I cant guarantee the downtime at that budget for a month. Now my client wants to receive 100$ refund, because I was not able to down the site for a month only a few days until the site changed protection. The reason of that is because the mentioned site changed some details about their protection. It was about a half month ago when the attack started so, I offed him 15 days of attack credit with the power of that 200$. I think its fair, but I would like to hear your opinion about it. Also you should know I was a bit busy under the attacks with exams, but I responded him always when I had time to do it. Lastly a great to know thing, layer7 (Application layer, for example websites) attack require hardware and proxies to be successful and it cost money. also sometimes tuning on the attack methods to use the correct useragent that able to pass the target's firewall rules. That is still an extra what I did because we agreed on the same specs what the site had when he purchased the service.

---

Shortly, we agreed on continious attack about the site with a specific specs that it had and I only guaranteed the downtime if the site have these specific level of specs like protection, hosting and else. Its changed after a few days ago and it caused the whole arguement about the service. I dont think I need to make the site down over what we agreed on and do extra job about it. Specially at that amount of monthly budget.

---

We made the agreement in dms. And I directly mentioned I guarantee the downtime for the same specs.

---

The attack ran fully until May 9 when we started argueing about that topic. The was just not down because the attack power what was added for the service was simply not enough anymore. And the budget (for more high quality proxy and a more powerful hardware) is not enough to down it again for the remaining amount of days.

[10]

So the things is a customer of mine ordered my ddos attack service for a month of holding a site (https://salonevenimente.ro/) for 200$. We agreed on the site would be down for 95% because there is some proxy pool changes and some about the attack. The agreement included that 95% guarantee was for the same site specifications (Protection level, hosting, WAF and more) because if the site's owner changes something about the site's protection, then I cant guarantee the downtime at that budget for a month. Now my client wants to receive 100$ refund, because I was not able to down the site for a month only a few days until the site changed protection. The reason of that is because the mentioned site changed some details about their protection. It was about a half month ago when the attack started so, I offed him 15 days of attack credit with the power of that 200$. I think its fair, but I would like to hear your opinion about it. Also you should know I was a bit busy under the attacks with exams, but I responded him always when I had time to do it. Lastly a great to know thing, layer7 (Application layer, for example websites) attack require hardware and proxies to be successful and it cost money. also sometimes tuning on the attack methods to use the correct useragent that able to pass the target's firewall rules. That is still an extra what I did because we agreed on the same specs what the site had when he purchased the service.

---

Shortly, we agreed on continious attack about the site with a specific specs that it had and I only guaranteed the downtime if the site have these specific level of specs like protection, hosting and else. Its changed after a few days ago and it caused the whole arguement about the service. I dont think I need to make the site down over what we agreed on and do extra job about it. Specially at that amount of monthly budget.

---

We made the agreement in dms. And I directly mentioned I guarantee the downtime for the same specs.

---

The attack ran fully until May 9 when we started argueing about that topic. The was just not down because the attack power what was added for the service was simply not enough anymore. And the budget (for more high quality proxy and a more powerful hardware) is not enough to down it again for the remaining amount of days.

1. From the start the website was down 2-3 hours and then up until I messaged him.
2. You said that you responded, but you didn’t respond for 2 days, you can see in my screenshot. And then you got silent until yesterday when I said that I want my money back.
3. You said that the attack run until yesterday, but after I messaged you about the refund, you instantly got the website down. You didn’t work on it, and you did when things got serious.
4. Our agreement was that the website will be down 95% but if the owner will change the spec, the downtime will lower, but you didn’t do 95% downtime in the first few days when the website spec was like when we agreed on. You had 9 days to get the website down, I messaged you 3 times and you didn’t do anything

Edit: like you said in dms, you are busy with the exams, but I don’t need to wait for you to finish them.

[46]

So the things is a customer of mine ordered my ddos attack service for a month of holding a site (https://salonevenimente.ro/) for 200$. We agreed on the site would be down for 95% because there is some proxy pool changes and some about the attack. The agreement included that 95% guarantee was for the same site specifications (Protection level, hosting, WAF and more) because if the site's owner changes something about the site's protection, then I cant guarantee the downtime at that budget for a month. Now my client wants to receive 100$ refund, because I was not able to down the site for a month only a few days until the site changed protection. The reason of that is because the mentioned site changed some details about their protection. It was about a half month ago when the attack started so, I offed him 15 days of attack credit with the power of that 200$. I think its fair, but I would like to hear your opinion about it. Also you should know I was a bit busy under the attacks with exams, but I responded him always when I had time to do it. Lastly a great to know thing, layer7 (Application layer, for example websites) attack require hardware and proxies to be successful and it cost money. also sometimes tuning on the attack methods to use the correct useragent that able to pass the target's firewall rules. That is still an extra what I did because we agreed on the same specs what the site had when he purchased the service.

---

Shortly, we agreed on continious attack about the site with a specific specs that it had and I only guaranteed the downtime if the site have these specific level of specs like protection, hosting and else. Its changed after a few days ago and it caused the whole arguement about the service. I dont think I need to make the site down over what we agreed on and do extra job about it. Specially at that amount of monthly budget.

---

We made the agreement in dms. And I directly mentioned I guarantee the downtime for the same specs.

---

The attack ran fully until May 9 when we started argueing about that topic. The was just not down because the attack power what was added for the service was simply not enough anymore. And the budget (for more high quality proxy and a more powerful hardware) is not enough to down it again for the remaining amount of days.

1. From the start the website was down 2-3 hours and then up until I messaged him.
2. You said that you responded, but you didn’t respond for 2 days, you can see in my screenshot. And then you got silent until yesterday when I said that I want my money back.
3. You said that the attack run until yesterday, but after I messaged you about the refund, you instantly got the website down. You didn’t work on it, and you did when things got serious.
4. Our agreement was that the website will be down 95% but if the owner will change the spec, the downtime will lower, but you didn’t do 95% downtime in the first few days when the website spec was like when we agreed on. You had 9 days to get the website down, I messaged you 3 times and you didn’t do anything

Edit: like you said in dms, you are busy with the exams, but I don’t need to wait for you to finish them.

Thats false, the site was down from the start I only tuned it on the first day. Also I made it fully down for about 3 days with that proxy rotation gap. And yes I was not able to deal with the site details change because I had exams, but defaultly I dont even needed to solve the new protection, since we agreed on the same details of the site.

---

So the things is a customer of mine ordered my ddos attack service for a month of holding a site (https://salonevenimente.ro/) for 200$. We agreed on the site would be down for 95% because there is some proxy pool changes and some about the attack. The agreement included that 95% guarantee was for the same site specifications (Protection level, hosting, WAF and more) because if the site's owner changes something about the site's protection, then I cant guarantee the downtime at that budget for a month. Now my client wants to receive 100$ refund, because I was not able to down the site for a month only a few days until the site changed protection. The reason of that is because the mentioned site changed some details about their protection. It was about a half month ago when the attack started so, I offed him 15 days of attack credit with the power of that 200$. I think its fair, but I would like to hear your opinion about it. Also you should know I was a bit busy under the attacks with exams, but I responded him always when I had time to do it. Lastly a great to know thing, layer7 (Application layer, for example websites) attack require hardware and proxies to be successful and it cost money. also sometimes tuning on the attack methods to use the correct useragent that able to pass the target's firewall rules. That is still an extra what I did because we agreed on the same specs what the site had when he purchased the service.

---

Shortly, we agreed on continious attack about the site with a specific specs that it had and I only guaranteed the downtime if the site have these specific level of specs like protection, hosting and else. Its changed after a few days ago and it caused the whole arguement about the service. I dont think I need to make the site down over what we agreed on and do extra job about it. Specially at that amount of monthly budget.

---

We made the agreement in dms. And I directly mentioned I guarantee the downtime for the same specs.

---

The attack ran fully until May 9 when we started argueing about that topic. The was just not down because the attack power what was added for the service was simply not enough anymore. And the budget (for more high quality proxy and a more powerful hardware) is not enough to down it again for the remaining amount of days.

1. From the start the website was down 2-3 hours and then up until I messaged him.
2. You said that you responded, but you didn’t respond for 2 days, you can see in my screenshot. And then you got silent until yesterday when I said that I want my money back.
3. You said that the attack run until yesterday, but after I messaged you about the refund, you instantly got the website down. You didn’t work on it, and you did when things got serious.
4. Our agreement was that the website will be down 95% but if the owner will change the spec, the downtime will lower, but you didn’t do 95% downtime in the first few days when the website spec was like when we agreed on. You had 9 days to get the website down, I messaged you 3 times and you didn’t do anything

Edit: like you said in dms, you are busy with the exams, but I don’t need to wait for you to finish them.

Thats false, the site was down from the start I only tuned it on the first day. Also I made it fully down for about 3 days with that proxy rotation gap. And yes I was not able to deal with the site details change because I had exams, but defaultly I dont even needed to solve the new protection, since we agreed on the same details of the site.

The first image is from May 1 when after the changed the site protection. I said I will try to fix it (again, I was not required to do it) but after that I mentioned him the site made mayor changes about protection and Im trying my best to fix it.

[46]

So the things is a customer of mine ordered my ddos attack service for a month of holding a site (https://salonevenimente.ro/) for 200$. We agreed on the site would be down for 95% because there is some proxy pool changes and some about the attack. The agreement included that 95% guarantee was for the same site specifications (Protection level, hosting, WAF and more) because if the site's owner changes something about the site's protection, then I cant guarantee the downtime at that budget for a month. Now my client wants to receive 100$ refund, because I was not able to down the site for a month only a few days until the site changed protection. The reason of that is because the mentioned site changed some details about their protection. It was about a half month ago when the attack started so, I offed him 15 days of attack credit with the power of that 200$. I think its fair, but I would like to hear your opinion about it. Also you should know I was a bit busy under the attacks with exams, but I responded him always when I had time to do it. Lastly a great to know thing, layer7 (Application layer, for example websites) attack require hardware and proxies to be successful and it cost money. also sometimes tuning on the attack methods to use the correct useragent that able to pass the target's firewall rules. That is still an extra what I did because we agreed on the same specs what the site had when he purchased the service.

---

Shortly, we agreed on continious attack about the site with a specific specs that it had and I only guaranteed the downtime if the site have these specific level of specs like protection, hosting and else. Its changed after a few days ago and it caused the whole arguement about the service. I dont think I need to make the site down over what we agreed on and do extra job about it. Specially at that amount of monthly budget.

---

We made the agreement in dms. And I directly mentioned I guarantee the downtime for the same specs.

---

The attack ran fully until May 9 when we started argueing about that topic. The was just not down because the attack power what was added for the service was simply not enough anymore. And the budget (for more high quality proxy and a more powerful hardware) is not enough to down it again for the remaining amount of days.

1. From the start the website was down 2-3 hours and then up until I messaged him.
2. You said that you responded, but you didn’t respond for 2 days, you can see in my screenshot. And then you got silent until yesterday when I said that I want my money back.
3. You said that the attack run until yesterday, but after I messaged you about the refund, you instantly got the website down. You didn’t work on it, and you did when things got serious.
4. Our agreement was that the website will be down 95% but if the owner will change the spec, the downtime will lower, but you didn’t do 95% downtime in the first few days when the website spec was like when we agreed on. You had 9 days to get the website down, I messaged you 3 times and you didn’t do anything

Edit: like you said in dms, you are busy with the exams, but I don’t need to wait for you to finish them.

Thats false, the site was down from the start I only tuned it on the first day. Also I made it fully down for about 3 days with that proxy rotation gap. And yes I was not able to deal with the site details change because I had exams, but defaultly I dont even needed to solve the new protection, since we agreed on the same details of the site.

[10]

https://imgur.com/a/upaaxUK - a screenshot when i said that the website it's down in the first few days

bro, you know that in the first few days i dmed you saying that the website it's up and you fix it, but the website was working half a day and down the other half... 

and you said that you needed to solve the new protection but it took you 10 minutes to do it when i said that i want my money back lol - https://imgur.com/a/uBg65n6 

And the final thing, yesterday i asked you to give me an answer about the refund, you said to wait that you are in the shower and then radio silent from you, like the others 3 times in the past... you don't care...  - https://imgur.com/a/XCQpyWE

[46]

https://imgur.com/a/upaaxUK - a screenshot when i said that the website it's down in the first few days

bro, you know that in the first few days i dmed you saying that the website it's up and you fix it, but the website was working half a day and down the other half... 

and you said that you needed to solve the new protection but it took you 10 minutes to do it when i said that i want my money back lol - https://imgur.com/a/uBg65n6 

And the final thing, yesterday i asked you to give me an answer about the refund, you said to wait that you are in the shower and then radio silent from you, like the others 3 times in the past... you don't care...  - https://imgur.com/a/XCQpyWE

Yes, it took 10 minutes to attack the site with a the enough power for it. I used about 3x more power then what we agreed on. As I said, I started solving the new captcha and stuff for you to make sure you satisfied and I gave no shit about we agreed on the same specs. I offered you even trying to find a solution for your site today, because I have some free resources that I can attach to your budget's power for free at all, that possibly able to take down your target. But again, I gave you a lot of extra over the agreement. About the radio silent moments, I said to you I'm having my final exams and I have only a little amount of time to talk. But that's not effected the attack since it ran automaticly. I made a mistake about the messaging but you should understand final exams is not something that I can ignore.